Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33471181›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2021

Unintended fusion in cervical artificial disk replacement: a prospective study on heterotopic ossification, progression, and clinical outcome, with 5-year follow-up.

Catarina Marques, Anna MacDowall, Martin Skeppholm, Nuno Canto Moreira, Claes Olerud

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Heterotopic ossification, osteolysis and implant failure following cervical total disc replacement with the M6-C™ artificial disc.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Catarina MarquesDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden. catarina.marques@surgsci.uu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-5530-2909
Anna MacDowallDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9231-7608
Martin SkeppholmDepartment for Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2228-2478
Nuno Canto MoreiraPediatric Radiology Section, Department of Clinical Neuroscience (CNS), K8, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5503-1793
Claes OlerudDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2111-6868
Uppsala University Hospital · SEKarolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHeterotopic ossification (HO) may cause unintended fusion in artificial disk replacement (ADR), failing to preserve motion. The reported incidence of HO varies hugely. This study aimed to determine prevalence of HO, progression, predisposing factors to occurrence and to progression, and potential effect on clinical outcomes.

methodsEighty-three patients treated with ADRs for cervical radiculopathy at one or two segments were extracted from a previously published RCT. Of the 83 patients, 59 had remaining ADR (79 implants) and sufficiently high-quality X-rays at 5 years of follow-up to allow analysis. HO was graded on plain films according to Mehren/Suchomel. Prevalence, progression, predisposing factors and effect on clinical outcome (Neck Disability Index-NDI) were analyzed.

resultsAt 2 years, HO was seen in 46/55 ADR implants (84%), severe enough to affect mobility in 27/55 (49%). At 5 years, HO was seen in 92% of 79 implants, severe in 71%. Male sex was a predisposing factor to HO. No predisposing factors to progression were identified. NDI was not affected by the severity of HO.

conclusionAlmost all ADR implants in our study have HO at 5 years of follow-up. Male sex is a risk factor. Severe HO did not affect clinical outcome.

trial registrationStudy registered at ISRCTN (registration number: 44347115).

Indexed as

Ossification, HeterotopicTotal Disc ReplacementCervical VertebraeFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeArtificial disk replacementCervical radiculopathyFusionHeterotopic ossificationTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID33471181
OpenAlexW3121139143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.