Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33471149›Full record

Observational studyWiener klinische Wochenschrift2021

Clinical pharmacist interventions in cardiovascular disease pharmacotherapy in elderly patients on excessive polypharmacy : A retrospective pre-post observational multicentric study.

Matej Stuhec, Ines Flegar, Erika Zelko, Alenka Kovačič, Valerija Zabavnik

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Matej StuhecDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Ormoz Psychiatric Hospital, Ptujska cesta 33, SI-2270, Ormoz, Slovenia. matejstuhec@gmail.com.
Ines FlegarFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Askerceva cesta 7, SI-1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Erika ZelkoFaculty of Medicine Maribor, Department of Pharmacology, University of Maribor, Taborska ulica 8, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia.
Alenka KovačičFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Askerceva cesta 7, SI-1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Valerija ZabavnikMurska Sobota General Hospital, Ulica dr. Vrbnjaka 6, Murska Sobota, Slovenia.
Pomurski muzej Murska Sobota · SIUniversity of Ljubljana · SIUniversity of Maribor · SIUniversity Psychiatric Hospital · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular diseases (CVD) are often treated with excessive polypharmacy (10 or more medications) in primary care, and these patients are mostly excluded from trials. Collaborative care, including clinical pharmacists (CP), is one of the possible approaches to address these problems; however, it has not been studied yet in this part of Europe. Hence, the main aim of the study was to determine how CP interventions in a medical review form (MR) can have an impact on the pharmacotherapy in patients on excessive polypharmacy with CVD (number of medications, potential drug-drug interactions of type X-pXDDI, potentially inappropriate medications in the elderly-PIM and treatment guidelines adherence).

methodsThis retrospective, observational pre-post multicentric study included elderly patients with CVDs aged 65 years or above, treated with 10 or more medications concomitantly (excessive polypharmacy) in Slovenian primary care (2012-2014). The MR provided by CPs included drug-related problems and potential pXDDIs, as well as PIMs. The pXDDIs were determined with Lexicomp Online. The German Priscus lists was used to determine PIMs. A binary logistic regression model was chosen to examine the influence of independent variables on the dependent variable (treatment guidelines adherence).

resultsIn this study 243 patients were included and 980 interventions were proposed in the MR form of which 479 (48.9%) were accepted by the general practitioners (GP). The CPs proposed 320 interventions in CVDs treatment, of which 140 were accepted by the GPs (43.8%). The acceptance of the CPs' recommendations reduced the number of medications by 7.3% (from 13.1 to 12.1 per patient; p < 0.05), the number of pXDDIs by 47.8% (from 40 to 12 patients; p < 0.05), the total of prescribed PIMs by 26.6% (p = 0.752) and adherence to arterial hypertension treatment guidelines was improved (p < 0.05).

conclusionCPs' interventions significantly improved the quality of pharmacotherapy prescribing by reducing the total number of medications and pXDDIs and led to better hypertension treatment guidelines adherence.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesPolypharmacyAgedHumansInappropriate PrescribingPharmacistsRetrospective StudiesCardiovascular problemsCollaborative careMedical reviewMedication-related problemsOlder adultsTreatment guidelines adherence

Identifiers

PMID33471149
OpenAlexW3122746779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.