Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33471127›Full record

ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2021

Patients and clinicians define symptom levels and meaningful change for PROMIS pain interference and fatigue in RA using bookmarking.

Clifton O Bingham, Alessandra L Butanis, Ana Maria Orbai, Michelle Jones, Victoria Ruffing, Anne Lyddiatt, Mary Suzanne Schrandt, Vivian P Bykerk, Karon F Cook, Susan J Bartlett

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The use of PROMIS measures in clinical studies in patients with inflammatory arthritis: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Minimal important change (MIC): a conceptual clarification and systematic review of MIC estimates of PROMIS measures.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Clarifying thresholds for defining levels of physical function and pain interference using bookmarking in orthopaedics.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Conceptualizing meaningful between-group difference in change over time: a demonstration of possible viewpoints.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Using bookmarking methods with orthopedic clinicians and patients with fractures produces score interpretation labels for patient-reported outcome measures.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Clifton O BinghamDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Alessandra L ButanisDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ana Maria OrbaiDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Michelle JonesDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Victoria RuffingDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Anne LyddiattPatient Partners in Arthritis, Ingersoll, ON, Canada.
Mary Suzanne SchrandtSociety to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine, Arlington, VA.
Vivian P BykerkHospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.
Karon F CookDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Susan J BartlettDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9755-2490
Johns Hopkins University · USHospital for Special Surgery · USJapan Society · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Sample Processing and Immunoassay Research CoreP30AR070254 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CLIFTON O BINGHAM, Antony Rosen · 2016 to 2026
$8.9M
NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR070254
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesUsing patient-reported outcomes to inform clinical decision-making depends on knowing how to interpret scores. Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) instruments are increasingly used in rheumatology research and care, but there is little information available to guide interpretation of scores. We sought to identify thresholds and meaningful change for PROMIS Pain Interference and Fatigue scores from the perspective of RA patients and clinicians.

methodsWe developed patient vignettes using the PROMIS item banks representing a continuum of Pain Interference and Fatigue levels. During a series of face-to-face 'bookmarking' sessions, patients and clinicians identified thresholds for mild, moderate and severe levels of symptoms and identified change deemed meaningful for making treatment decisions.

resultsIn general, patients selected higher cut points to demarcate thresholds than clinicians. Patients and clinicians generally identified changes of 5-10 points as representing meaningful change. The thresholds and meaningful change scores of patients were grounded in their lived experiences having RA, approach to self-management, and the impacts on function, roles and social participation.

conclusionResults offer new information about how both patients and clinicians view RA symptoms and functional impacts. Results suggest that patients and providers may use different strategies to define and interpret RA symptoms, and select different thresholds when describing symptoms as mild, moderate or severe. The magnitude of symptom change selected by patients and clinicians as being clinically meaningful in interpreting treatment efficacy and loss of response may be greater than levels determined by external anchor and statistical methods.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidFatigueFemaleHumansMaleMethotrexateMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSeverity of Illness IndexSymptom AssessmentTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsMethotrexatepatient reported outcomespatient reported outcomes measurement information systemPROMIS

Identifiers

PMID33471127
PMCPMC8633670
OpenAlexW3123750794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.