Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33470935›Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2021

Technology-Assisted Home Care for People With Dementia and Their Relatives: Scoping Review.

Sarah Palmdorf, Anna Lea Stark, Stephan Nadolny, Gerrit Eliaß, Christoph Karlheim, Stefan H Kreisel, Tristan Gruschka, Eva Trompetter, Christoph Dockweiler

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah PalmdorfInstitute for Educational and Health-care Research in the Health Sector, Bielefeld University of Applied Sciences, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7804-3383
Anna Lea StarkCentre for ePublic Health Research, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9219-5666
Stephan NadolnyInstitute for History and Ethics of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6826-6433
Gerrit EliaßInnovation & Research, Executive Department, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, University Hospital OWL - Campus Bielefeld-Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7163-3070
Christoph KarlheimInnovation & Research, Executive Department, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, University Hospital OWL - Campus Bielefeld-Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2868-4307
Stefan H KreiselDivision of Geriatric Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, University Hospital OWL - Campus Bielefeld-Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7623-3423
Tristan GruschkaFaculty of Social Studies, Bielefeld University of Applied Sciences, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8717-5935
Eva TrompetterDivision of Geriatric Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, University Hospital OWL - Campus Bielefeld-Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5653-9943
Christoph DockweilerCentre for ePublic Health Research, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1024-3279
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bielefeld · DEBielefeld University · DEHochschule Bielefeld · DESt. Franziskus Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssistive technologies for people with dementia and their relatives have the potential to ensure, improve, and facilitate home care and thereby enhance the health of the people caring or being cared for. The number and diversity of technologies and research have continuously increased over the past few decades. As a result, the research field has become complex.

objectiveThe goal of this scoping review was to provide an overview of the research on technology-assisted home care for people with dementia and their relatives in order to guide further research and technology development.

methodsA scoping review was conducted following a published framework and by searching 4 databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and CENTRAL) for studies published between 2013 and 2018. We included qualitative and quantitative studies in English or German focusing on technologies that support people with dementia or their informal carers in the home care setting. Studies that targeted exclusively people with mild cognitive impairment, delirium, or health professionals were excluded as well as studies that solely consisted of assessments without implication for the people with dementia or their relatives and prototype developments. We mapped the research field regarding study design, study aim, setting, sample size, technology type, and technology aim, and we report relative and absolute frequencies.

resultsFrom an initial 5328 records, we included 175 studies. We identified a variety of technology types including computers, telephones, smartphones, televisions, gaming consoles, monitoring devices, ambient assisted living, and robots. Assistive technologies were most commonly used by people with dementia (77/175, 44.0%), followed by relatives (68/175, 38.9%), and both target groups (30/175, 17.1%). Their most frequent goals were to enable or improve care, provide therapy, or positively influence symptoms of people with dementia (eg, disorientation). The greatest proportions of studies were case studies and case series (72/175, 41.1%) and randomized controlled trials (44/175, 25.1%). The majority of studies reported small sample sizes of between 1 and 50 participants (122/175, 69.7%). Furthermore, most of the studies analyzed the effectiveness (85/233, 36.5%) of the technology, while others targeted feasibility or usability or were explorative.

conclusionsThis review demonstrated the variety of technologies that support people with dementia and their relatives in the home care setting. Whereas this diversity provides the opportunity for needs-oriented technical solutions that fit individual care arrangements, it complicates the choice of the right technology. Therefore, research on the users' informational needs is required. Moreover, there is a need for larger studies on the technologies' effectiveness that could contribute to a higher acceptance and thus to a transition of technologies from research into the daily lives of people with dementia and their relatives.

Indexed as

assistive technologiesdementiahome carescoping review

Identifiers

PMID33470935
PMCPMC7857954
OpenAlexW3121813713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.