Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33470930›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

Comparison of induced neurons reveals slower structural and functional maturation in humans than in apes.

Maria Schörnig, Xiangchun Ju, Luise Fast, Sebastian Ebert, Anne Weigert, Sabina Kanton, Theresa Schaffer, Nael Nadif Kasri, Barbara Treutlein, Benjamin Marco Peter and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Role for Astrocyte Metabolism in Species-Specific Neuronal Development.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Temporal Transcriptional Regulation of Human Neuronal Differentiation via Forward Programming.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Schörnig *Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5334-5342
Xiangchun Ju *Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Luise FastMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Sebastian EbertMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Anne WeigertMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Sabina KantonMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Theresa SchafferMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Nael Nadif KasriDepartment of Human Genetics and Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Barbara TreutleinMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Benjamin Marco PeterMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2526-8081
Wulf HeversMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1881-5913
Elena TavernaMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2430-4725
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology · DERadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We generated induced excitatory neurons (iNeurons, iNs) from chimpanzee, bonobo, and human stem cells by expressing the transcription factor neurogenin-2 (NGN2). Single-cell RNA sequencing showed that genes involved in dendrite and synapse development are expressed earlier during iNs maturation in the chimpanzee and bonobo than the human cells. In accordance, during the first 2 weeks of differentiation, chimpanzee and bonobo iNs showed repetitive action potentials and more spontaneous excitatory activity than human iNs, and extended neurites of higher total length. However, the axons of human iNs were slightly longer at 5 weeks of differentiation. The timing of the establishment of neuronal polarity did not differ between the species. Chimpanzee, bonobo, and human neurites eventually reached the same level of structural complexity. Thus, human iNs develop slower than chimpanzee and bonobo iNs, and this difference in timing likely depends on functions downstream of NGN2.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationHumansNeuritesNeurogenesisNeuronsPan paniscusPan troglodytesSpecies SpecificitybonoboChimpanzeedevelopmental biologyevolutionhumanneurodevelopmentneuronal functionneuronal maturationneuroscience

Identifiers

PMID33470930
PMCPMC7870144
OpenAlexW3125777898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.