Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33470684›Full record

SynthesisCurrent opinion in urology2021

Outcomes of thulium fibre laser for treatment of urinary tract stones: results of a systematic review.

Peter Kronenberg, Bm Zeeshan Hameed, Bhaskar Somani

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current opinion in urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05814133 (Prospective Clinical Trial To Evaluate The Thulium Fiber Laser For The Ureteroscopic Treatment Of Nephrolithiasis), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05814133 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Clinical Trial To Evaluate The Thulium Fiber Laser For The Ureteroscopic Treatment Of Nephrolithiasis

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)Ran2024 to 2025Enrolled150ConditionsKidney StoneArmsThulium Fiber Laser
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Adoption of thulium fiber laser for lithotripsy A scoping review and bibliometric analysis.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Innovations in Kidney Stone Removal.Research and reports in urology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter KronenbergHospital CUF Descobertas, Lisbon, Portugal.
Bm Zeeshan HameedKasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Bhaskar SomaniUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Hospital do Desterro · PTKasturba Medical College, Manipal · INUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewLasers have become a fundamental aspect of stone treatment. Although Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser is the current gold-standard in endoscopic laser lithotripsy, there is a lot of buzz around the new thulium fibre laser (TFL). We decided to evaluate the latest data to help create an objective and evidence-based opinion about this new technology and associated clinical outcomes. RECENT

findingsSixty full-text articles and peer-reviewed abstract presentations were included in the qualitative synthesis of this systematic review performed over the last 2 years. Current super pulsed TFL machines are capable of achieving peak powers of 500W and emit very small pulse energies of 0.025 Joules going up to 6 Joules, and capable of frequency over 2000 Hz. This makes the TFL ablate twice as fast for fragmentation, 4 times as fast for dusting, more stone dust of finer size and less retropulsion compared to the Ho:YAG laser. Because of the smaller laser fibres with the TFL, future miniaturization of instruments is also possible. SUMMARY: Based on the review, the TFL is a potential game-changer for kidney stone disease and has a promising role in the future. However larger multicentric prospective clinical studies with long-term follow-up are needed to establish the safety and efficacy of the TFL in endourology.

Indexed as

Lasers, Solid-StateLithotripsy, LaserUrinary CalculiHolmiumHumansProspective StudiesThuliumHolmiumThulium

Identifiers

PMID33470684
PMCPMC7879830
OpenAlexW3124473115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.