ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2021
ROBOTIC GASTRECTOMY: TECHNIQUE STANDARDIZATION.
Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic surgery in gastrointestinal cancers: short-term clinical outcomes and micro-costing analysis from a reference oncologic center.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Prospective comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: real-life analysis of procedural standardization and safety during the initial adoption phase.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Is high-quality robotic surgery a solo performance by the console surgeon?Gastroenterology report · 2026Article
- Predictive model for prolonged hospital stay risk after gastric cancer surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTrocars position for the Si model (position is similar for the Xi, although trocars stay more in line). Robotic gastrectomy is gaining popularity worldwide. It allows reduced blood loss and lesser pain. However, it widespread use is limited by the extensive learning curve and costs.
aimTo describe our standard technique with reduced use of robotic instruments.
methodsWe detail the steps involved in the procedure, including trocar placement, necessary robotic instruments, and meticulous surgical description.
resultsAfter standardizing the procedure, 28 patients were operated with this budget technique. For each procedure material used was: 1 (Xi model) or 2 disposable trocars (Si) and 4 robotic instruments. Stapling and clipping were performed by the assistant through an auxiliary port, limiting the use of robotic instruments and reducing the cost.
conclusionThis standardization helps implementing a robotic program for gastrectomy in the daily practice or in one`s institution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.