Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33470161›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2021

Swelling Behaviors of 3D Printed Hydrogel and Hydrogel-Microcarrier Composite Scaffolds.

Sean M Bittner, Hannah A Pearce, Katie J Hogan, Mollie M Smoak, Jason L Guo, Anthony J Melchiorri, David W Scott, Antonios G Mikos

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sean M BittnerDepartment of Bioengineering and Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
Hannah A PearceDepartment of Bioengineering and Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
Katie J HoganDepartment of Bioengineering and Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
Mollie M SmoakDepartment of Bioengineering and Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jason L GuoDepartment of Bioengineering and Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
Anthony J MelchiorriDepartment of Bioengineering and Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
David W ScottDepartment of Statistics, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
Antonios G MikosDepartment of Bioengineering and Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.
Baylor College of Medicine · USRice University · US

Funding

3D-Printed Demineralized Bone Matrix Hydrogels for Craniofacial Bone Tissue Regeneration.F31DE030333 · NIDCR · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI HOGAN, KATIE · 2020 to 2022
$141k
NIDCR NIH HHS F31 DE030333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study sought to demonstrate the swelling behavior of hydrogel-microcarrier composite constructs to inform their use in controlled release and tissue engineering applications. In this study, gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) and GelMA-gelatin microparticle (GMP) composite constructs were three-dimensionally printed, and their swelling and degradation behavior was evaluated over time and as a function of the degree of crosslinking of included GMPs. GelMA-only constructs and composite constructs loaded with GMPs crosslinked with 10 mM (GMP-10) or 40 mM (GMP-40) glutaraldehyde were swollen in phosphate-buffered saline for up to 28 days to evaluate changes in swelling and polymer loss. In addition, scaffold reswelling capacity was evaluated under five successive drying-rehydration cycles. All printed materials demonstrated shear thinning behavior, with microparticle additives significantly increasing viscosity relative to the GelMA-only solution. Swelling results demonstrated that for GelMA/GMP-10 and GelMA/GMP-40 scaffolds, fold and volumetric swelling were statistically higher and lower, respectively, than for GelMA-only scaffolds after 28 days, and the volumetric swelling of GelMA and GelMA/GMP-40 scaffolds decreased over time. After 5 drying-rehydration cycles, GelMA scaffolds demonstrated higher fold swelling than both GMP groups while also showing lower volumetric swelling than GMP groups. Although statistical differences were not observed in the swelling of GMP-10 and GMP-40 particles alone, the interaction of GelMA/GMP demonstrated a significant effect on the swelling behaviors of composite scaffolds. These results demonstrate an example hydrogel-microcarrier composite system's swelling behavior and can inform the future use of such a composite system for controlled delivery of bioactive molecules

Indexed as

HydrogelsTissue ScaffoldsGelatinPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue EngineeringGelatinHydrogels3D printingbiomaterial inkhydrogelmicrocarriermicroparticlemultiphasic scaffold

Identifiers

PMID33470161
PMCPMC8349726
OpenAlexW3124414999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.