ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2021
Swelling Behaviors of 3D Printed Hydrogel and Hydrogel-Microcarrier Composite Scaffolds.
Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combining gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels with mesenchymal stem cells: A versatile approach for bone tissue engineering.Histology and histopathology · 2026Review
- Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning-Assisted Statistical Modeling of Biopolymer Hydrogel Swelling for Material Optimization.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Patient-Specific Dual-Function 3D-Printed Gels for Antimicrobial and Analgesic Management of Alveolar Osteitis.ACS materials Au · 2026Article
- 4D morphogenetic tissue engineering via gradient-crosslinked microporous hydrogel scaffolds.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Design considerations for photoinitiator selection in cell-laden gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels.Biomaterials science · 2026Article
- The introduction and evaluation of novel decellularized extracellular matrix/gellan gum bioprinting scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Engineering Anisotropic Mechanical Properties in Large-Scale Fabricated Cartilage Constructs Using Microfiber Reinforcement.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- Biofabrication of Tunable 3D Hydrogel for Investigating the Matrix Stiffness Impact on Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Resistance.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Article
- Novel Soft Dosage Forms for Paediatric Applications: Can We 3D-Print Them or Not?Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Development and Characterization of a Gelatin-Based Photoactive Hydrogel for Biomedical Application.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- 3D digital light process bioprinting: Cutting-edge platforms for resolution of organ fabrication.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- The Impact of Temperature and the Duration of Freezing on a Hydrogel Used for a 3D-Bioprinted In Vitro Skin Model.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- 3D Printing Process Research and Performance Tests on Sodium Alginate-Xanthan Gum-Hydroxyapatite Hybridcartilage Regenerative Scaffolds.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2024Article
- Leveraging 3D Bioprinting and Photon-Counting Computed Tomography to Enable Noninvasive Quantitative Tracking of Multifunctional Tissue Engineered Constructs.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023Article
- Treatment strategies for intrauterine adhesion: focus on the exosomes and hydrogels.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Bioprinted Hydrogels for Fibrosis and Wound Healing: Treatment and Modeling.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Progress in the application of sustained-release drug microspheres in tissue engineering.Materials today. Bio · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The present study sought to demonstrate the swelling behavior of hydrogel-microcarrier composite constructs to inform their use in controlled release and tissue engineering applications. In this study, gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) and GelMA-gelatin microparticle (GMP) composite constructs were three-dimensionally printed, and their swelling and degradation behavior was evaluated over time and as a function of the degree of crosslinking of included GMPs. GelMA-only constructs and composite constructs loaded with GMPs crosslinked with 10 mM (GMP-10) or 40 mM (GMP-40) glutaraldehyde were swollen in phosphate-buffered saline for up to 28 days to evaluate changes in swelling and polymer loss. In addition, scaffold reswelling capacity was evaluated under five successive drying-rehydration cycles. All printed materials demonstrated shear thinning behavior, with microparticle additives significantly increasing viscosity relative to the GelMA-only solution. Swelling results demonstrated that for GelMA/GMP-10 and GelMA/GMP-40 scaffolds, fold and volumetric swelling were statistically higher and lower, respectively, than for GelMA-only scaffolds after 28 days, and the volumetric swelling of GelMA and GelMA/GMP-40 scaffolds decreased over time. After 5 drying-rehydration cycles, GelMA scaffolds demonstrated higher fold swelling than both GMP groups while also showing lower volumetric swelling than GMP groups. Although statistical differences were not observed in the swelling of GMP-10 and GMP-40 particles alone, the interaction of GelMA/GMP demonstrated a significant effect on the swelling behaviors of composite scaffolds. These results demonstrate an example hydrogel-microcarrier composite system's swelling behavior and can inform the future use of such a composite system for controlled delivery of bioactive molecules
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.