Trial reportJournal of gynecologic oncology2021
Phase 2 single-arm study on the safety of maintenance niraparib in Japanese patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer.
Trial report in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03759587 (A Phase 2, Multicenter, Open-label, Single-arm Study to Evaluate the Safety of Niraparib in Japanese Patients With Platinum-sensitive, Relapsed Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer Who Achieved CR or PR in the Last Chemotherapy Containing Platinum-based Anticancer Agents), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Open-label, Single-arm Study to Evaluate the Safety of Niraparib in Japanese Patients With Platinum-sensitive, Relapsed Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer Who Achieved CR or PR in the Last Chemotherapy Containing Platinum-based Anticancer Agents
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Niraparib in Japanese patients with heavily pretreated, homologous recombination-deficient ovarian cancer: final results of a multicenter phase 2 study.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2024Trial
- Niraparib in Japanese patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: final results of a multicenter phase 2 study.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2024Trial
- Niraparib as maintenance therapy in Japan: a retrospective observational study using a Japanese claims database.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2025Observational
- DNA Damage Response Alterations in Ovarian Cancer: From Molecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic Opportunities.Cancers · 2023Review
- Individualization in the first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer based on the mechanism of action of molecularly targeted drugs.International journal of clinical oncology · 2022Review
- Expectations and Challenges of First-Line Maintenance Therapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Review
- How to start niraparib in real-world Asian ovarian cancer patients?Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2021Article
- Factors Influencing Severe Hematologic Toxicity Following Niraparib Therapy in Patients With Ovarian Cancer.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 17 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of niraparib 300 mg/day in Japanese patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer in a maintenance setting.
methodsPhase 2, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study enrolled Japanese patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer who had received ≥2 platinum-based regimens. The primary endpoint (incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia-related events within 30 days after initial niraparib administration) was justified by the incidences of a global pivotal phase 3 study and its post-hoc safety analysis on thrombocytopenia, the major hematological adverse event of niraparib. The overall safety analysis examined other treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).
resultsEnrolled patients (n=19) had a median (min, max) body weight of 53.9 (40.8-79.1) kg; all but one patient weighed <77 kg. Most (94.7%) patients initially received niraparib 300 mg/day but this decreased in subsequent cycles (mean±standard deviation dose intensity, 191.6±65.7 mg/day). In total, 6/19 (31.6%) patients experienced grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia-related events within 30 days of initial niraparib administration. Other common TEAEs included nausea, and decreased platelet or neutrophil counts. No progression-free or overall survival events occurred; only 1 of 4 response-evaluable patients had a post-baseline tumor assessment (stable disease).
conclusionThe incidence of grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia-related events in Japanese ovarian cancer patients was similar to that in the corresponding non-Japanese study. Overall, the safety profile was acceptable and consistent with the known safety profile and previous experience with niraparib.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03759587.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.