Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33469880›Full record

ReviewReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2021

Somatic Genomic Events in Endometriosis: Review of the Literature and Approach to Phenotyping.

Paul J Yong, Aline Talhouk, Michael S Anglesio

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Endometriosis and adenomyosis unveiled through single-cell glasses.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. KRAS mutations and endometriosis burden of disease.The journal of pathology. Clinical research · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul J YongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. pyong@cw.bc.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-5521-3052
Aline TalhoukDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7760-410X
Michael S AnglesioDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1639-5003
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, we provide a survey and appraisal of research into somatic genomic events in endometriosis. Methodologies have evolved from conventional cytogenetics to next-generation sequencing, with findings ranging from chromosome imbalances to recurrent somatic cancer driver mutations. Somatic cancer driver mutations have been described in a range of endometriosis lesions, dominated by recurrent mutations in KRAS and PIK3CA as well as loss of PTEN and BAF250a (ARID1A). These somatic events appear to be largely restricted to the endometriosis glandular epithelium. Somatic mutations, particularly PTEN loss, have also been observed in eutopic (uterine) endometrium, although at lower mutant allele frequencies compared with ectopic lesions. Systematic studies of the potential clinical phenotype of these somatic genomic events have yet to be performed. Thus, we propose a framework to investigate the potential clinical phenotype associated with somatic genomic events in endometriosis. Technical requirements include pathology review of histological endometriosis, microdissection for tissue enrichment, orthogonal validation of whole genome/exome sequencing, and a germline sample for confirmation of somatic origin. Clinical requirements include annotation of surgical findings; patient demographics; cross-sectional and prospective data on pain and fertility; consideration of sampling multiple lesions in each patient, mutant allele frequency, and somatic events in the eutopic endometrium; and confirmation of any associations with mechanistic studies. Given the multifactorial nature of endometriosis-associated symptoms, it is likely that somatic events have small (or at most, moderate) effect sizes, and thus careful consideration will have to be given to future study design.

Indexed as

PhenotypeAneuploidyCross-Sectional StudiesEndometriosisEndometriumExome SequencingFemaleGenomicsHumansMutationProspective StudiesCytogeneticsEndometriosisKRASNext generation sequencingSomatic mutations

Identifiers

PMID33469880
OpenAlexW3121940315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.