Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33469818›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2021

Comparison of a Bayesian estimation algorithm and singular value decomposition algorithms for 80-detector row CT perfusion in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Shota Ichikawa, Hiroyuki Yamamoto, Takumi Morita

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Correlation between pretreatment and follow-up infarct volume using CT perfusion imaging: the Bayesian versus singular value decomposition method.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shota IchikawaDepartment of Radiological Technology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Miwa, Kurashiki, Okayama, 710-8602, Japan. s-ichikawa@frontier.hokudai.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4275-1422
Hiroyuki YamamotoDepartment of Radiological Technology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Miwa, Kurashiki, Okayama, 710-8602, Japan.
Takumi MoritaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kurashiki Central Hospital, 1-1-1 Miwa, Kurashiki, Okayama, 710-8602, Japan.
Kurashiki Central Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA variety of postprocessing algorithms for CT perfusion are available, with substantial differences in terms of quantitative maps. Although potential advantages of a Bayesian estimation algorithm are suggested, direct comparison with other algorithms in clinical settings remains scarce. We aimed to compare performance of a Bayesian estimation algorithm and singular value decomposition (SVD) algorithms for the assessment of acute ischemic stroke using an 80-detector row CT perfusion.

methodsCT perfusion data of 36 patients with acute ischemic stroke were analyzed using the Vitrea implemented a standard SVD algorithm, a reformulated SVD algorithm and a Bayesian estimation algorithm. Correlations and statistical differences between affected and contralateral sides of quantitative parameters (cerebral blood volume [CBV], cerebral blood flow [CBF], mean transit time [MTT], time to peak [TTP] and delay) were analyzed. Agreement of the CT perfusion-estimated and the follow-up diffusion-weighted imaging-derived infarct volume were evaluated by nonparametric Passing-Bablok regression analysis.

resultsCBF and MTT of the Bayesian estimation algorithm were substantially different and showed a better correlation with the standard SVD algorithm (ρ = 0.78 and 0.80, p < 0.001) than with the reformulated SVD algorithm (ρ = 0.59 and 0.39, p < 0.001). There is no significant difference in MTT only when using the reformulated SVD algorithm (p = 0.217). Regarding the regression lines, the slope and intercept were nearly ideal with the Bayesian estimation algorithm (y = 2.42 x-6.51; ρ = 0.60, p < 0.001) in comparison with the SVD algorithms.

conclusionsThe Bayesian estimation algorithm can lead to a better performance compared with the SVD algorithms in the assessment of acute ischemic stroke because of better delineation of abnormal perfusion areas and accurate estimation of infarct volume.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAcute DiseaseAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBayes TheoremFemaleHumansIschemic StrokeMaleMiddle AgedMultidetector Computed TomographyRetrospective StudiesAcute ischemic strokeBayesian estimation algorithmComputed tomography perfusionInfarction volumeSingular value decomposition algorithm

Identifiers

PMID33469818
OpenAlexW3123892286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.