Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33469728›Full record

Trial reportJapanese journal of ophthalmology2021

Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for steroid-resistant optic neuritis: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled phase III study.

Osamu Mimura, Hitoshi Ishikawa, Takeshi Kezuka, Keigo Shikishima, Tone Suzuki, Makoto Nakamura, Hideki Chuman, Kenji Inoue, Akiko Kimura, Akiko Yamagami and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Update on glial antibody-mediated optic neuritis.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Update on Optic Neuritis: An International View.Neuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Osamu MimuraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan. omimurahomburg@gmail.com.
Hitoshi IshikawaDepartment of Orthoptics and Visual Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Japan.
Takeshi KezukaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tokyo Medical University, Shinjuku, Japan.
Keigo ShikishimaDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato, Japan.
Tone SuzukiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Japan.
Makoto NakamuraDivision of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Hideki ChumanDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan.
Kenji InoueInoue Eye Hospital, Chiyoda, Japan.
Akiko KimuraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Akiko YamagamiInoue Eye Hospital, Chiyoda, Japan.
Maki MihoyaPharmaceutical Development Administration Department, Teijin Pharma Limited, Chiyoda, Japan.
Yuzo NakaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan.
Hyogo Medical University · JPInouye Eye Hospital · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPKindai University · JPKitasato University · JPKobe University · JPSocial Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital · JPTeijin (Japan) · JPTokyo Medical University · JPUniversity of Miyazaki · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous "freeze-dried sulfonated human normal immunoglobulin (GGS)" in patients with steroid-resistant optic neuritis (ON). STUDY

designMulticenter, prospective, double-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial.

methodsPatients with steroid-resistant acute ON were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous GGS (GGS group) or intravenous methylprednisolone (steroid pulse [SP] group). Visual acuity (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]), mean deviation (MD) value of the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and critical flicker fusion frequency were measured as efficacy endpoints; adverse events (AEs) were assessed as the safety endpoint.

resultsThirty-two patients (16 patients/group) received the study drugs. The primary endpoint, change in logMAR at week 2 compared to baseline, showed no statistically significant intergroup difference. However, compared with the SP group, change in the GGS group was increasingly indicative of visual improvement, with least squares mean difference of > 0.3 logMAR. On post-hoc analyses, the percentage of patients in the GGS and SP groups with improvement by ≥ 0.3 logMAR at week 2 were 75.0% and 31.3%, respectively. Changes in MD values at week 2 compared to baseline were 9.258  ±  8.296 (mean ± standard deviation) dB and 3.175  ±  6.167 dB in the GGS and SP groups, respectively. These results showed statistically significant intergroup differences (visual acuity improvement, P = 0.032; change in MD values, P = 0.030). No clinically significant AEs were observed.

conclusionOur results suggest that intravenous immunoglobulin could be a safe and efficacious therapeutic option for prompt treatment of steroid-resistant acute ON.

trial registrationJapicCTI-132080.

Indexed as

Immunoglobulins, IntravenousOptic NeuritisDouble-Blind MethodHumansMethylprednisoloneProspective StudiesSteroidsTreatment OutcomeImmunoglobulins, IntravenousMethylprednisoloneSteroidsAnti-aquaporin-4 antibodyIntravenous immunoglobulinOptic neuritisPhase IIISteroid-resistant

Identifiers

PMID33469728
OpenAlexW3125752937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.