ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2021
Double-digest RAD-sequencing: do pre- and post-sequencing protocol parameters impact biological results?
Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Benchmarking imputation accuracy in the presence or absence of a reference panel.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Next-Generation Genotyping: Innovations Driving Plant Genomic Improvement.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Hitchhiking Parasites: Unstructured Populations of Bat Ectoparasites Reveal Host-Driven Dispersal.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Fine-tuning GBS data with comparison of reference and mock genome approaches for advancing genomic selection in less studied farmed species.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Next-generation data filtering in the genomics era.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024Review
- Ex situ conservation of two rare oak species using microsatellite and SNP markers.Evolutionary applications · 2024Article
- Variant calling and genotyping accuracy of ddRAD-seq: Comparison with 20X WGS in layers.PloS one · 2024Article
- Phylogenomics of the gray-breasted sabrewing (Campylopterus largipennis) species complex in the Amazonia and Cerrado biomes.Genetics and molecular biology · 2024Article
- Commonly used Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium filtering schemes impact population structure inferences using RADseq data.Molecular ecology resources · 2022Article
- Microevolutionary dynamics show tropical valleys are deeper for montane birds of the Atlantic Forest.Nature communications · 2021Article
- There Is No 'Rule of Thumb': Genomic Filter Settings for a Small Plant Population to Obtain Unbiased Gene Flow Estimates.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Genetic, morphological and ecological variation across a sharp hybrid zone between two alpine butterfly species.Evolutionary applications · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing technologies have opened a new era of research in population genetics. Following these new sequencing opportunities, the use of restriction enzyme-based genotyping techniques, such as restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq) or double-digest RAD-sequencing (ddRAD-seq), has dramatically increased in the last decade. From DNA sampling to SNP calling, the laboratory and bioinformatic parameters of enzyme-based techniques have been investigated in the literature. However, the impact of those parameters on downstream analyses and biological results remains less documented. In this study, we investigated the effects of sevral pre- and post-sequencing settings on ddRAD-seq results for two biological systems: a complex of butterfly species (Coenonympha sp.) and several populations of common beech (Fagus sylvatica). Our results suggest that pre-sequencing parameters (i.e., DNA quantity, number of PCR cycles during library preparation) have a significant impact on the number of recovered reads and SNPs, on the number of unique alleles and on individual heterozygosity. In the same way, we found that post-sequencing settings (i.e., clustering and minimum coverage thresholds) influenced loci reconstruction (e.g., number of loci, mean coverage) and SNP calling (e.g., number of SNPs; heterozygosity) but had only a marginal impact on downstream analyses (e.g., measure of genetic differentiation, estimation of individual admixture, and demographic inferences). In addition, replication analyses confirmed the reproducibility of the ddRAD-seq procedure. Overall, this study assesses the degree of sensitivity of ddRAD-seq data to pre- and post-sequencing protocols, and illustrates its robustness when studying population genetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.