Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33469514›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020

A Decision-Making Supporting Prediction Method for Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Dong Song, Xiaxia Man, Meng Jin, Qian Li, Han Wang, Ye Du

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dong SongDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Xiaxia ManDepartment of Oncological Gynecology, The First Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Meng JinSchool of Information Science and Technology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China.
Qian LiDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Han WangSchool of Information Science and Technology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China.
Ye DuDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) may increase the resection rate of breast cancer and shows promising effects on patient prognosis. It has become a necessary treatment choice and is widely used in the clinical setting. Benefitting from the clinical information obtained during NAC treatment, computational methods can improve decision-making by evaluating and predicting treatment responses using a multidisciplinary approach, as there are no uniformly accepted protocols for all institutions for adopting different treatment regiments. In this study, 166 Chinese breast cancer cases were collected from patients who received NAC treatment at the First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University. The Miller-Payne grading system was used to evaluate the treatment response. Four machine learning multiple classifiers were constructed to predict the treatment response against the 26 features extracted from the patients' clinical data, including Random Forest (RF) model, Convolution Neural Network (CNN) model, Support Vector Machine (SVM) model, and Logistic Regression (LR) model, where the RF model achieved the best performance using our data. To allow a more general application, the models were reconstructed using only six selected features, and the RF model achieved the highest performance with 54.26% accuracy. This work can efficiently guide optimal treatment planning for breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

breast cancerdecision-makingmultiple classificationneoadjuvant chemotherapytreatment efficacy prediction

Identifiers

PMID33469514
PMCPMC7813988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.