Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33469490›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2021

Endogenous fungal endophthalmitis: risk factors, clinical course, and visual outcome in 13 patients.

Jamel Corredores, Itzhak Hemo, Tareq Jaouni, Zohar Habot-Wilner, Michal Kramer, Shiri Shulman, Haneen Jabaly-Habib, Ala'a Al-Talbishi, Michael Halpert, Edward Averbukh and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Endogenous Candida endophthalmitis].Die Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Fungal Endophthalmitis on Ocular Ultrasound: A Case Report.Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jamel CorredoresDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem 91240, Israel.
Itzhak HemoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem 91240, Israel.
Tareq JaouniDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem 91240, Israel.
Zohar Habot-WilnerSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Avi 6997801, Israel.
Michal KramerSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Avi 6997801, Israel.
Shiri ShulmanSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Avi 6997801, Israel.
Haneen Jabaly-HabibDepartment of Ophthalmology, Poriya Medical Center, Tiberias 1528001, Israel.
Ala'a Al-TalbishiSt John Eye Hospital, Jerusalem 91198, Israel.
Michael HalpertDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem 91240, Israel.
Edward AverbukhDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem 91240, Israel.
Jaime LevyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem 91240, Israel.
Iris Deitch-HarelSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Avi 6997801, Israel.
Radgonde AmerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem 91240, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo analyze the risk factors, ophthalmological features, treatment modalities and their effect on the visual outcome in patients with endogenous fungal endophthalmitis (EFE).

methodsData retrieved from the medical files included age at presentation to the uveitis clinic, gender, ocular symptoms and their duration before presentation, history of fever, eye affected, anatomical diagnosis and laboratory evidence of fungal infection. Medical therapy recorded included systemic antifungal therapy and its duration, use of intravitreal antifungal agents and use of oral/intravitreal steroids. Surgical procedures and the data of ophthalmologic examination at presentation and at last follow-up were also collected.

resultsIncluded were 13 patients (20 eyes, mean age 58y). Ten patients presented after gastrointestinal or urological interventions and two presented after organ transplantation. In one patient, there was no history of previous intervention. Diagnostic vitrectomy was performed in 16 eyes (80%) and vitreous cultures were positive in 10 of the vitrectomized eyes (62.5%). In only 4 patients (31%), blood cultures were positive. All patients received systemic antifungal therapy. Sixteen eyes (80%) received intravitreal antifungal agent with voriconazole being the most commonly used. Visual acuity (VA) improved from 0.9±0.9 at initial exam to 0.5±0.8 logMAR at last follow-up (

conclusionHigh index of suspicion in patients with inciting risk factors is essential because of the low yield of blood cultures and the good general condition of patients at presentation. Visual prognosis is improved with the prompt institution of systemic and intravitreal pharmacotherapy and the immediate surgical intervention. Oral±local steroids could be considered in cases of prolonged or marked inflammatory responses in order to hasten control of inflammation and limit ocular complications.

Indexed as

candida endophthalmitisendogenous endophthalmitisendogenous fungal endophthalmitisendophthalmitisfungal endophthalmitis

Identifiers

PMID33469490
PMCPMC7790672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.