Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33469381›Full record

ArticleClinical epidemiology2021

Validation of ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Codes for Identification of Patients with Acute Hemorrhagic Stroke in a National Health Insurance Claims Database.

Meng-Tsang Hsieh, Kuo-Chang Huang, Cheng-Yang Hsieh, Tzu-Tung Tsai, Li-Ching Chen, Sheng-Feng Sung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Meng-Tsang Hsieh *Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Kuo-Chang Huang *Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chiayi City, Taiwan.
Cheng-Yang HsiehDepartment of Neurology, Tainan Sin Lau Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-8772-4073
Tzu-Tung TsaiStroke Center and Department of Neurology, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5211-0306
Li-Ching ChenStroke Center and Department of Neurology, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Sheng-Feng SungDivision of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chiayi City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-6253-8813

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe performance of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes for identifying acute hemorrhagic stroke in Taiwan's National Health Insurance claims database has not been assessed. This study aimed to construct and validate the case definitions for acute hemorrhagic stroke based on ICD-10-CM diagnostic codes. PATIENTS AND

methodsFrom January 2018 to December 2019, all inpatient records with ICD-10-CM code of I60 or I61 in any field of the discharge diagnoses were retrieved from the hospitalization claims data and all hospitalizations with a final diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) were identified from the stroke registry databases. The clinical diagnosis in the stroke registry was treated as the reference standard. For hospitalizations not recorded in the stroke registry, manual review of the medical records and images was done to ascertain the diagnosis. The positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivity of various case definitions for acute hemorrhagic stroke were estimated.

resultsAmong the 983 hospitalizations, 860, 111, and 12 were determined to be true-positive, false-positive, and false-negative episodes of acute hemorrhagic stroke, respectively. The PPV and sensitivity of the ICD-10-CM codes of I60 or I61 for identifying acute hemorrhagic stroke were 88.6% and 98.6%, respectively. The PPV increased to 98.2%, whereas the sensitivity decreased to 93.1% when acute hemorrhagic stroke was defined as hospitalizations in which the primary diagnosis field contained I60 or I61. Hemorrhagic transformation of ischemic stroke and concomitant cerebrovascular diseases other than SAH or ICH were the main reasons for a false-positive and false-negative diagnosis of acute hemorrhagic stroke, respectively.

conclusionThis study demonstrated the performance of ICD-10-CM codes for identifying acute hemorrhagic stroke and may offer a reference for future claims-based stroke studies.

Indexed as

administrative claims datadiagnosishemorrhagic strokeICD-10-CM

Identifiers

PMID33469381
PMCPMC7813455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.