Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33469374›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2021

Impact of Primary Site Surgery on Survival of Patients with de novo Stage IV Breast Cancer.

Zhen Huang, Qixing Tan, Qinghong Qin, Qinguo Mo, Changyuan Wei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Axillary lymph node removal inGland surgery · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhen Huang *Department of Breast Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, People's Republic of China.
Qixing Tan *Department of Breast Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-8092-7740
Qinghong QinDepartment of Breast Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, People's Republic of China.
Qinguo MoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, People's Republic of China.
Changyuan WeiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, People's Republic of China.
Guangxi Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe efficacy of primary site surgery in patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer remains controversial. However, few real-world studies have evaluated the benefits of local surgery on the primary site of stage IV breast cancer in China. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of local surgery in the de novo stage IV breast cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsWomen with metastatic breast cancer at diagnosis were identified from Guangxi medical university cancer hospital (China) database from 2009 to 2017. The clinical and tumor features, surgical treatment, and survival rates were compared between surgical and non-surgical patients.

resultsTwo hundred forty-three patients were included, of whom 125 underwent primary site surgery. Patients who underwent surgery were more often had small primary tumors, fewer lymph node metastases, and had less visceral involvement. Patients in the surgery group had dramatically longer OS (median 35 vs 22 months, log-rank

conclusionSurgical resection of the primary site can improve survival in selected de novo stage IV breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

stage IV breast cancersurgerysurvival

Identifiers

PMID33469374
PMCPMC7811446
OpenAlexW3119445861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.