Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33469205›Full record

ReviewNature medicine2021

Looking beyond COVID-19 vaccine phase 3 trials.

Jerome H Kim, Florian Marks, John D Clemens

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 311 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
311citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
39.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

311 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 631 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Safety and efficiency of COVID-19 vaccine in North Africa.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

251 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 5 countries.

Jerome H KimInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea. jerome.kim@ivi.int.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0461-6438
Florian MarksInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
John D ClemensInternational Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
International Vaccine Institute · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After the recent announcement of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy in clinical trials by several manufacturers for protection against severe disease, a comprehensive post-efficacy strategy for the next steps to ensure vaccination of the global population is now required. These considerations should include how to manufacture billions of doses of high-quality vaccines, support for vaccine purchase, coordination of supply, the equitable distribution of vaccines and the logistics of global vaccine delivery, all of which are a prelude to a massive vaccination campaign targeting people of all ages. Furthermore, additional scientific questions about the vaccines remain that should be answered to improve vaccine efficacy, including questions regarding the optimization of vaccination regimens, booster doses, the correlates of protection, vaccine effectiveness, safety and enhanced surveillance. The timely and coordinated execution of these post-efficacy tasks will bring the pandemic to an effective, and efficient, close.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunity, HerdSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID33469205
OpenAlexW3123175540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.