Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33469166›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2021

A genomic view of the microbiome of coral reef demosponges.

S J Robbins, W Song, J P Engelberts, B Glasl, B M Slaby, J Boyd, E Marangon, E S Botté, P Laffy, T Thomas and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A genomic view of Earth's biomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Identification and Antimicrobial Potential of Marine Sponges (International journal of microbiology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

S J RobbinsAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
W SongCentre for Marine Science & Innovation, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5890-5361
J P EngelbertsAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
B GlaslAustralian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, QLD, 4810, Australia.
B M SlabyGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, 24105, Kiel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9480-1460
J BoydAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
E MarangonAustralian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, QLD, 4810, Australia.
E S BottéAustralian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, QLD, 4810, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5070-5891
P LaffyAustralian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, QLD, 4810, Australia.
T ThomasCentre for Marine Science & Innovation, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9557-3001
N S WebsterAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia. N.Webster@aims.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4753-5278
Australian Institute of Marine Science · AUThe University of Queensland · AUUNSW Sydney · AUGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sponges underpin the productivity of coral reefs, yet few of their microbial symbionts have been functionally characterised. Here we present an analysis of ~1200 metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) spanning seven sponge species and 25 microbial phyla. Compared to MAGs derived from reef seawater, sponge-associated MAGs were enriched in glycosyl hydrolases targeting components of sponge tissue, coral mucus and macroalgae, revealing a critical role for sponge symbionts in cycling reef organic matter. Further, visualisation of the distribution of these genes amongst symbiont taxa uncovered functional guilds for reef organic matter degradation. Genes for the utilisation of sialic acids and glycosaminoglycans present in sponge tissue were found in specific microbial lineages that also encoded genes for attachment to sponge-derived fibronectins and cadherins, suggesting these lineages can utilise specific structural elements of sponge tissue. Further, genes encoding CRISPR and restriction-modification systems used in defence against mobile genetic elements were enriched in sponge symbionts, along with eukaryote-like gene motifs thought to be involved in maintaining host association. Finally, we provide evidence that many of these sponge-enriched genes are laterally transferred between microbial taxa, suggesting they confer a selective advantage within the sponge niche and therefore play a critical role in host ecology and evolution.

Indexed as

AnthozoaMicrobiotaPoriferaAnimalsCoral ReefsGenomicsMetagenome

Identifiers

PMID33469166
PMCPMC8163846
OpenAlexW3122004546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.