ArticleEye (London, England)2021
The sensitivity and specificity of retinal and choroidal folds to distinguish between mild papilloedema and pseudopapilledema.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Utility of Paton's Folds and Quantitative OCT Metrics in Pediatric Papilledema.Ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Agreement and Accuracy of Papilledema and Pseudopapilledema Classification Among Pediatric Neuro-Ophthalmologists Using Optic Disc Photographs.Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society · 2025Observational
- Identifying biomarkers for papilledema and pseudopapilledema.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Distinguishing Papilledema from Pseudopapilledema in Children.Advances in ophthalmology and optometry · 2024Article
- Chorioretinal abnormalities in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: case reports.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2022Article
- Awareness, Diagnosis and Management of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo determine if the presence or absence of retinal and choroidal folds on SD-OCT imaging can distinguish between mild papilloedema and pseudopapilledema.
designCross-sectional cohort study
methodsSubjects with optic disc elevation (Frisen grades 1 and 2 only) were eligible to be enrolled prospectively. Pseudopapilledema was defined as a lack of change in optic disc appearance between two visits <6 months apart, and papilloedema was defined as change in optic disc appearance between two visits <6 months apart determined by review of fundus photographs by a masked neuro-ophthalmologist. Three masked neuro-ophthalmologists independently reviewed en face and axial optical coherence tomography (OCT) images of the optic nerve of the study subjects for the presence or absence of retinal and choroidal folds. Concordance was determined when there was agreement between at least 2 of the 3 observers.
resultsForty-five subjects (78 eyes) met inclusion criteria. There were 32 eyes with papilloedema and 46 eyes with pseudopapilledema. Choroidal and/or retinal folds were detected in 38% of eyes (12/32) with papilloedema and 19.6% of eyes (9/46) with pseudopapilledema. Post-hoc analyses eliminated six questionable cases of pseudopapilledema that had ancillary testing suggestive of elevated intracranial pressure and resulted in one remaining eye (2%) with more certain pseudopapilledema that was found to have folds. En face OCT imaging was more sensitive (71%) in detection of folds than axial OCT imaging (57%).
conclusionsChoroidal and/or retinal folds on OCT are commonly observed in patients with mild papilloedema and are uncommon in those with pseudopapilledema. The presence of folds on OCT in patients presenting with disc elevation suggests papilloedema.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.