Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33469032›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Dissection of the Fgf8 regulatory landscape by in vivo CRISPR-editing reveals extensive intra- and inter-enhancer redundancy.

A Hörnblad, S Bastide, K Langenfeld, F Langa, F Spitz

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Aberrant Enhancer Regulation, Phase Separation, and Autoimmune Diseases.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genomic context sensitizes regulatory elements to genetic disruption.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The GRN concept as a guide for evolutionary developmental biology.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

A HörnbladDevelopmental Biology Unit, EMBL, Meyerhofstrasse 1, Heidelberg, 69117, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1283-0784
S Bastide *Developmental Biology Unit, EMBL, Meyerhofstrasse 1, Heidelberg, 69117, Germany.
K Langenfeld *Developmental Biology Unit, EMBL, Meyerhofstrasse 1, Heidelberg, 69117, Germany.
F LangaMouse Genetics Engineering, Center for Innovation & Technological Research, Institut Pasteur, 75015, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0801-5464
F SpitzDevelopmental Biology Unit, EMBL, Meyerhofstrasse 1, Heidelberg, 69117, Germany. fspitz@uchicago.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1960-829X
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FREuropean Molecular Biology Organization · DEInstitut Pasteur · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developmental genes are often regulated by multiple elements with overlapping activity. Yet, in most cases, the relative function of those elements and their contribution to endogenous gene expression remain poorly characterized. An example of this phenomenon is that distinct sets of enhancers have been proposed to direct Fgf8 in the limb apical ectodermal ridge and the midbrain-hindbrain boundary. Using in vivo CRISPR/Cas9 genome engineering, we functionally dissect this complex regulatory ensemble and demonstrate two distinct regulatory logics. In the apical ectodermal ridge, the control of Fgf8 expression appears distributed between different enhancers. In contrast, we find that in the midbrain-hindbrain boundary, one of the three active enhancers is essential while the other two are dispensable. We further dissect the essential midbrain-hindbrain boundary enhancer to reveal that it is also composed by a mixture of essential and dispensable modules. Cross-species transgenic analysis of this enhancer suggests that its composition may have changed in the vertebrate lineage.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsCRISPR-Cas SystemsEctodermEmbryo, MammalianEmbryonic DevelopmentEnhancer Elements, GeneticExtremitiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleFibroblast Growth Factor 8Gene Regulatory NetworksGenetic EngineeringMaleMesencephalonMiceFgf8 protein, mouseFibroblast Growth Factor 8

Identifiers

PMID33469032
PMCPMC7815712
OpenAlexW3121272729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.