Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33468653›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Live-cell epigenome manipulation by synthetic histone acetylation catalyst system.

Yusuke Fujiwara, Yuki Yamanashi, Akiko Fujimura, Yuko Sato, Tomoya Kujirai, Hitoshi Kurumizaka, Hiroshi Kimura, Kenzo Yamatsugu, Shigehiro A Kawashima, Motomu Kanai

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Precision Chemistry for Protein Lysine Modification.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yusuke FujiwaraGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Yuki YamanashiGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Akiko FujimuraGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Yuko SatoCell Biology Center, Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama 226-8503, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7805-9171
Tomoya KujiraiInstitute for Quantitative Biosciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Hitoshi KurumizakaInstitute for Quantitative Biosciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7412-3722
Hiroshi KimuraCell Biology Center, Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama 226-8503, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0854-083X
Kenzo YamatsuguGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan; yamatsugu@mol.f.u-tokyo.ac.jp skawashima@mol.f.u-tokyo.ac.jp kanai@mol.f.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4260-414X
Shigehiro A KawashimaGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan; yamatsugu@mol.f.u-tokyo.ac.jp skawashima@mol.f.u-tokyo.ac.jp kanai@mol.f.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2946-6627
Motomu KanaiGraduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan; yamatsugu@mol.f.u-tokyo.ac.jp skawashima@mol.f.u-tokyo.ac.jp kanai@mol.f.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1977-7648
The University of Tokyo · JPTokyo Institute of Technology · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical modifications of histones, such as lysine acetylation and ubiquitination, play pivotal roles in epigenetic regulation of gene expression. Methods to alter the epigenome thus hold promise as tools for elucidating epigenetic mechanisms and as therapeutics. However, an entirely chemical method to introduce histone modifications in living cells without genetic manipulation is unprecedented. Here, we developed a chemical catalyst, PEG-LANA-DSSMe 11, that binds with nucleosome's acidic patch and promotes regioselective, synthetic histone acetylation at H2BK120 in living cells. The size of polyethylene glycol in the catalyst was a critical determinant for its in-cell metabolic stability, binding affinity to histones, and high activity. The synthetic acetylation promoted by 11 without genetic manipulation competed with and suppressed physiological H2B ubiquitination, a mark regulating chromatin functions, such as transcription and DNA damage response. Thus, the chemical catalyst will be a useful tool to manipulate epigenome for unraveling epigenetic mechanisms in living cells.

Indexed as

EpigenomeProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalAcetylationCatalysisChemical EngineeringEpigenesis, GeneticGlycoconjugatesHeLa CellsHistonesHumansLysineNucleosomesOligopeptidesPolyethylene GlycolsUbiquitinationGlycoconjugatesHistonesLysineNucleosomesOligopeptidesPolyethylene Glycolsacetylationcatalystepigenomehistoneubiquitination

Identifiers

PMID33468653
PMCPMC7848698
OpenAlexW3122986909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.