Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33468627›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

Using data-driven approaches to improve delivery of animal health care interventions for public health.

Stella Mazeri, Jordana L Burdon Bailey, Dagmar Mayer, Patrick Chikungwa, Julius Chulu, Paul Orion Grossman, Frederic Lohr, Andrew D Gibson, Ian G Handel, Barend M deC Bronsvoort and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Human rabies: prospects for elimination.CAB reviews : perspectives in agriculture, veterinary science, nutrition and natural resources · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Stella MazeriThe Epidemiology, Economics and Risk Assessment Group, The Roslin Institute and The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Roslin EH25 9RG, United Kingdom; stella.mazeri@roslin.ed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4591-8267
Jordana L Burdon BaileyMission Rabies, Blantyre, Malawi.
Dagmar MayerWorldwide Veterinary Service, Blantyre, Malawi.
Patrick ChikungwaDepartment of Animal Health and Livestock Development, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Julius ChuluDepartment of Animal Health and Livestock Development, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Paul Orion GrossmanMission Rabies, Blantyre, Malawi.
Frederic LohrMission Rabies, Cranborne BH21 5PZ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7158-3122
Andrew D GibsonThe Epidemiology, Economics and Risk Assessment Group, The Roslin Institute and The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Roslin EH25 9RG, United Kingdom.
Ian G HandelThe Epidemiology, Economics and Risk Assessment Group, The Roslin Institute and The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Roslin EH25 9RG, United Kingdom.
Barend M deC BronsvoortThe Epidemiology, Economics and Risk Assessment Group, The Roslin Institute and The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Roslin EH25 9RG, United Kingdom.
Luke GambleMission Rabies, Cranborne BH21 5PZ, United Kingdom.
Richard J MellanbyDivision of Veterinary Clinical Studies, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Hospital for Small Animals, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Roslin EH25 9RG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3467-7007

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J004235/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P013740/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rabies kills ∼60,000 people per year. Annual vaccination of at least 70% of dogs has been shown to eliminate rabies in both human and canine populations. However, delivery of large-scale mass dog vaccination campaigns remains a challenge in many rabies-endemic countries. In sub-Saharan Africa, where the vast majority of dogs are owned, mass vaccination campaigns have typically depended on a combination of static point (SP) and door-to-door (D2D) approaches since SP-only campaigns often fail to achieve 70% vaccination coverage. However, D2D approaches are expensive, labor-intensive, and logistically challenging, raising the need to develop approaches that increase attendance at SPs. Here, we report a real-time, data-driven approach to improve efficiency of an urban dog vaccination campaign. Historically, we vaccinated ∼35,000 dogs in Blantyre city, Malawi, every year over a 20-d period each year using combined fixed SP (FSP) and D2D approaches. To enhance cost effectiveness, we used our historical vaccination dataset to define the barriers to FSP attendance. Guided by these insights, we redesigned our vaccination campaign by increasing the number of FSPs and eliminating the expensive and labor-intensive D2D component. Combined with roaming SPs, whose locations were defined through the real-time analysis of vaccination coverage data, this approach resulted in the vaccination of near-identical numbers of dogs in only 11 d. This approach has the potential to act as a template for successful and sustainable future urban SP-only dog vaccination campaigns.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CarePublic HealthAnimalsDogsHealth SurveysImmunization ProgramsMalawiRegression AnalysisVaccinationdata-drivenMalawirabiesvaccinationzoonosis

Identifiers

PMID33468627
PMCPMC7865124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.