Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33468529›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Impact on health and provision of healthcare services during the COVID-19 lockdown in India: a multicentre cross-sectional study.

Rajiv Raman, Ramachandran Rajalakshmi, Janani Surya, Radha Ramakrishnan, Sobha Sivaprasad, Dolores Conroy, Jitendra Pal Thethi, V Mohan, Gopalakrishnan Netuveli

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
24.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Diabetic Foot Assessment and Care: Barriers and Facilitators in a Cross-Sectional Study in Bangalore, India.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Rajiv RamanShri Bhagwan Mahavir Vitreoretinal Services, Medical Research Foundation, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India rajivpgraman@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5842-0233
Ramachandran RajalakshmiDr.Mohan's Diabetes Specialities Centre and Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, India.
Janani SuryaDiabetic Retinopathy Project, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, India.
Radha RamakrishnanUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
Sobha SivaprasadNIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hosp NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Dolores ConroyUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
Jitendra Pal ThethiB005 Meenakshi Classic, Bangalore, India.
V MohanMadras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, India.
Gopalakrishnan NetuveliUniversity of East London, London, UK.
Madras Diabetes Research Foundation · INSankara Nethralaya · INUniversity College London · GBMeenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research · INNIHR Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre · GBUniversity of East London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P027881/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a national lockdown in India from midnight on 25 March 2020, with conditional relaxation by phases and zones from 20 April. We evaluated the impact of the lockdown in terms of healthcare provisions, physical health, mental health and social well-being within a multicentre cross-sectional study in India.

methodsThe SMART India study is an ongoing house-to-house survey conducted across 20 regions including 11 states and 1 union territory in India to study diabetes and its complications in the community. During the lockdown, we developed an online questionnaire and delivered it in English and seven popular Indian languages (Hindi, Tamil, Marathi, Telegu, Kannada, Bengali, Malayalam) to random samples of SMART-India participants in two rounds from 5 May 2020 to 24 May 2020. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the overall impact on health and healthcare provision in phases 3 and 4 of lockdown in red and non-red zones and their interactions.

resultsA total of 2003 participants completed this multicentre survey. The bivariate relationships between the outcomes and lockdown showed significant negative associations. In the multivariable analyses, the interactions between the red zones and lockdown showed that all five dimensions of healthcare provision were negatively affected (non-affordability: OR 1.917 (95% CI 1.126 to 3.264), non-accessibility: OR 2.458 (95% CI 1.549 to 3.902), inadequacy: OR 3.015 (95% CI 1.616 to 5.625), inappropriateness: OR 2.225 (95% CI 1.200 to 4.126) and discontinuity of care: OR 6.756 (95% CI 3.79 to 12.042)) and associated depression and social loneliness.

conclusionThe impact of COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown on health and healthcare was negative. The exaggeration of income inequality during lockdown can be expected to extend the negative impacts beyond the lockdown.

Indexed as

Mental HealthAdultAgedCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareDiabetes MellitusFemaleHealth ServicesHumansIndiaLogistic ModelsLonelinessMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisCOVID-19general diabetesquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID33468529
PMCPMC7817386
OpenAlexW3125204700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.