Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33468498›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Impact of dementia education and training on health and social care staff knowledge, attitudes and confidence: a cross-sectional study.

Sahdia Parveen, Sarah Jane Smith, Cara Sass, Jan R Oyebode, Andrea Capstick, Alison Dennison, Claire A Surr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. People Living With Dementia and Their Families as Educators for Social Justice.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sahdia ParveenCentre For Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK s.parveen27@bradford.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5041-5306
Sarah Jane SmithCentre for Dementia Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Cara SassCentre for Dementia Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Jan R OyebodeCentre For Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.
Andrea CapstickCentre For Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.
Alison DennisonCentre For Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.
Claire A SurrCentre for Dementia Research, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4312-6661

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to establish the impact of dementia education and training on the knowledge, attitudes and confidence of health and social care staff. The study also aimed to identify the most effective features (content and pedagogical) of dementia education and training.

designCross-sectional survey study. Data collection occurred in 2017. SETTINGS: Health and social care staff in the UK including acute care, mental health community care trusts, primary care and care homes.

participantsAll health and social care staff who had completed dementia education and training meeting the minimal standards as set by Health Education England, within the past 5 years were invited to participate in an online survey. A total of 668 health and social care staff provided informed consent and completed an online survey, and responses from 553 participants were included in this study. The majority of the respondents were of white British ethnicity (94.4%) and identified as women (88.4%). OUTCOMES: Knowledge, attitude and confidence of health and social care staff.

resultsHierarchical multiple regression analysis was conducted. Staff characteristics, education and training content variables and pedagogical factors were found to account for 29% of variance in staff confidence (F=4.13, p<0.001), 22% of variance in attitude (knowledge) (F=3.80, p<001), 18% of the variance in staff knowledge (F=2.77, p<0.01) and 14% of variance in staff comfort (attitude) (F=2.11, p<0.01).

conclusionThe results suggest that dementia education and training has limited impact on health and social care staff learning outcomes. While training content variables were important when attempting to improve staff knowledge, more consideration should be given to pedagogical factors when training is aiming to improve staff attitude and confidence.

Indexed as

DementiaHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleHumansSocial SupportSurveys and Questionnairesdementiaeducation & training (see medical education & training)geriatric medicine

Identifiers

PMID33468498
PMCPMC7817792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.