Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33468448›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

Going From Zero to 100 in Remote Dementia Research: A Practical Guide.

Megan E O'Connell, Shirin Vellani, Sheryl Robertson, Hannah M O'Rourke, Kathy S McGilton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Case Reports in the Integration of Technology with Cognitive Rehabilitation for Individuals with Memory Concerns and Their Care Partners.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Playing remotely in times of crisis: A program to overcome social isolation.International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Megan E O'ConnellUniversity of Saskatchewan, Department of Psychology, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6159-4322
Shirin VellaniUniversity Health Network, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6032-0266
Sheryl RobertsonUniversity Health Network, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6089-7452
Hannah M O'RourkeUniversity of Alberta, Faculty of Nursing, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0041-3708
Kathy S McGiltonUniversity Health Network, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2470-9738
University Health Network · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remote approaches for dementia research are required in the era of COVID-19, but moving a research program from in person to remote involves additional considerations. We recommend using outcome measures that have psychometric properties for remote delivery, and we recommend against adapting in-person scales for remote delivery without evidence for psychometric equivalency. We suggest remote research designs that maximize benefit for participants, which could have implications for control groups. Researchers should plan for flexibility in their methods for remote research and must not assume all participants will be able to videoconference; telephone-only research is possible. We recommend performing an assessment of information communication technology infrastructure and prior exposure to this technology with each participant before making a final choice on remote methods for research. In general, researchers should adapt their methods for remote research to each participant rather than requesting participants to adapt to the researchers. Screening for sensory loss should be conducted, and the impact of this on the use of technology for remote research should be considered. In this viewpoint, we detail how individualized training is required prior to engaging in remote research, how training plans interact with cognitive impairments and, finally, the steps involved in facilitating technology-based remote data collection.

Indexed as

DementiaTelemedicineVideoconferencingBiomedical ResearchCognitive DysfunctionCOVID-19HumansCOVID-19dementiainformation communications technologytelehealthvideoconferencing

Identifiers

PMID33468448
PMCPMC7842855
OpenAlexW3124866299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.