Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33468129›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Social determinants of the impact of hospital management boards on quality management: a study of 109 European hospitals using a parsonian approach.

Holger Pfaff, Antje Hammer, Marta Ballester, Kristina Schubin, Michael Swora, Rosa Sunol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Holger PfaffInstitute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Human Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Eupener Strasse 129, 50933, Cologne, Germany. holger.pfaff@uk-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9154-6575
Antje HammerInstitute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Human Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Eupener Strasse 129, 50933, Cologne, Germany.
Marta BallesterAvedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Kristina SchubinInstitute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Human Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Eupener Strasse 129, 50933, Cologne, Germany.
Michael SworaInstitute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Human Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Eupener Strasse 129, 50933, Cologne, Germany.
Rosa SunolAvedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

FP7 Health 241822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe consolidated framework for implementation research states that personal leadership matters in quality management implementation. However, it remains to be answered which characteristics of plural leadership in hospital management boards make them impactful. The present study focuses on social determinants of implementation power of hospital boards using Talcott Parsons' sociological concept of adaptation, goal attainment, integration, and latency (AGIL), focusing on the G (goal attainment) and I (integration) factors of this concept. The study aims to test the hypothesis that hospitals with management boards that are oriented toward the quality goal (G) and socially integrated (I) (GI boards) are better at implementing quality management than hospitals with boards lacking these characteristics (non-GI boards).

methodsA cross-sectional mixed-method design was used for data collection in 109 randomly selected hospitals in seven European countries. Data is based on the study "Deepening our understanding of quality improvement in Europe" (DUQUE). We used responses from (a) hospitals' chief executive officers to measure the variable social integration and the variable quality orientation of the board and (b) responses from quality managers to measure the degree of implementation of the quality management system. We developed the GI index measuring the combination of goal-orientation and integration. A multiple linear regression analysis was performed.

resultsHospitals with management boards that are quality oriented and socially integrated (GI boards) had significantly higher scores on the quality management system index than hospitals with boards scoring low on these features, when controlled for several context factors.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that the implementation power of hospital management boards is higher if there is a sense of unity and purpose within the boards. Thus, to improve quality management, it could be worthwhile to increase boards' social capital and to increase time designated for quality management in board meetings.

Indexed as

Hospital AdministrationSocial Determinants of HealthCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeGoverning BoardHospitalsHumansConsolidated framework for implementation researchHospital management boardImplementation powerLeadershipQuality managementSocial capitalTop management team

Identifiers

PMID33468129
PMCPMC7814745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.