Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33468123›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2021

Prevalence, distribution and risk factors for brucellosis infection in goat farms in Ningxiang, China.

Yin Li, Dan Tan, Shuang Xue, Chaojian Shen, Huajie Ning, Chang Cai, Zengzai Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Epidemiology of Brucellosis in Small Ruminants of Rural and Peri-Urban Areas of Multan, Pakistan.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yin Li *Changsha Animal Disease Control Center, No.12 Xianjiahu Road, Changsha, 410007, Hunan, P.R. China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5720-5267
Dan Tan *Changsha Animal Disease Control Center, No.12 Xianjiahu Road, Changsha, 410007, Hunan, P.R. China.
Shuang XueChangsha Animal Disease Control Center, No.12 Xianjiahu Road, Changsha, 410007, Hunan, P.R. China.
Chaojian ShenAnimal Health and Epidemiology Center, No. 369 Nanjing Road, Qingdao, 266032, Shandong, P.R. China.
Huajie NingChangsha Animal Disease Control Center, No.12 Xianjiahu Road, Changsha, 410007, Hunan, P.R. China.
Chang CaiZhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, 311300, China.
Zengzai LiuChangsha Animal Disease Control Center, No.12 Xianjiahu Road, Changsha, 410007, Hunan, P.R. China. 15378351@qq.com.

Funding

the Key Project of Modern Agriculture Techniques in Changsha k1401005-21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn south China, goats are the major source of Brucellosis for human infection. However, there are few studies on the prevalence of and risk factors for goat brucellosis in south China. In this study, we conducted a cross-sectional study to investigate the herd prevalence, spatial distribution and relevant risk factors for goat brucellosis in Ningxiang county, south China. Commercial goat farms (n = 457) were randomly selected, and their disease status was ascertained by testing serum samples of chosen individuals using the Rose Bengal Test (screening test) and the Serum Agglutination Test (confirmatory test) in series. A farm with at least two positive individuals was defined as a case farm. Standardized questionnaires were used to collect information on management and hygiene practices in farms. A logistic model with a binomial outcome was built to identify risk factors for being seropositive.

resultsThe true herd prevalence in commercial goat farms was 4.5% (95%CI: 0.2%-12.2%) and the townships in the centre of the county had higher herd prevalence. The risk factors associated with seropositive on local goat farms include "Introduction in the past 12 months" (OR= 61, 95%CI: 16-333), "Improperly disposal of the sick or dead goats" (OR= 33, 95%CI: 5-341) and "Poor hygiene in lambing pen" (OR= 25, 95%CI: 5-192).

conclusionsThese findings will aid in the development of control strategies of Brucellosis in south China and risk factors identified in this study should be taken into consideration when designing a control strategy.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimalsBrucellaBrucellosisChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGoat DiseasesGoatsPrevalenceRisk FactorsSeroepidemiologic StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesBrucellosisChinaGoat farmingRisk factorsRuminants

Identifiers

PMID33468123
PMCPMC7814720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.