Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33468105›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2021

Early visual quality outcomes after small-incision lenticule extraction surgery for correcting high myopic astigmatism.

Xiangtao Hou, Kaixuan Du, Dan Wen, Shengfa Hu, Tu Hu, Chenling Li, Yanhui Tang, Xiaoying Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Impact of the preoperative cylinder on astigmatism correction in femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEX): a prospective observational study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond-assisted laserInternational journal of ophthalmology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiangtao HouEye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Kaixuan DuEye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Dan WenEye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Shengfa HuEye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Tu HuEye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Chenling LiEye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Yanhui TangEye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Xiaoying WuEye Center of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China. hewuan@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7913-118X
Central South University · CN

Funding

Central South University Kq1701079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate early optical quality outcomes after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) surgery for correcting high myopic astigmatism.

methodsThis retrospective study enrolled 55 eyes from 37 patients who had preoperative myopic astigmatism of ≥2.00 diopters (D) who had been treated with SMILE surgery. Preoperatively, the mean cylinder was - 2.41 ± 0.54 D (range, - 2.00 D to - 4.50 D). The preoperative and postoperative visual outcomes, refraction, and higher-order aberration (HOA) at 1 and 3 months were compared. Refractive astigmatism changes were analyzed by the Alpins vector method.

resultsThree months after SMILE surgery, the average cylinder was - 0.14 ± 0.31 D, and the average astigmatism vector was - 0.09 D × 6.34°. The angle of error (AofE) was limited to within ±10°, and the magnitude of error was limited to within ±1.0 D in all patients. The correction index (CI) was 0.98 ± 0.07, the index of success (IOS) was 0.08 ± 0.13, and the flattening index (FI) was 0.97 ± 0.07. Significant positive correlations were found between IOS and |AofE| (P = 0.000); negative correlations were found between FI and |AofE| (P = 0.000). The postoperative total HOA, spherical aberration, vertical coma aberration, and trefoil 30° were increased significantly compared with preoperative measurements, and the increase in HOA was closely related to preoperative astigmatism (P < 0.05).

conclusionsSMILE has preferable outcomes for correcting high myopic astigmatism. Axis rotation during the surgery might influence the undercorrection of astigmatism. The increase of HOA after surgery is related to preoperative astigmatism.

Indexed as

AstigmatismCorneal Surgery, LaserCorneal StromaHumansLasers, ExcimerRefraction, OcularRetrospective StudiesVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID33468105
PMCPMC7816348
OpenAlexW3121823112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.