Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33468104›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

The Mitigating Toxic Stress study design: approaches to developmental evaluation of pediatric health care innovations addressing social determinants of health and toxic stress.

Julie S McCrae, Jo Ann L Robinson, Angeline K Spain, Kaela Byers, Jennifer L Axelrod

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julie S McCraeChapin Hall at the University of Chicago, 1313 E. 16th Street, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. jmccrae@chapinhall.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8113-7900
Jo Ann L RobinsonUniversity of Connecticut, 348 Mansfield Road U1058, Storrs, CT, 06269-1058, USA.
Angeline K SpainChapin Hall at the University of Chicago, 1313 E. 16th Street, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Kaela ByersUniversity of Kansas, 1545 Lilac Lane, Lawrence, KS, 66045, USA.
Jennifer L AxelrodThe Chicago Community Trust, 225 N, Michigan Avenue, Suite 2100, Chicago, IL, 60601, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth care administrators must establish and promote effective partnerships with community agencies to address social determinants of health, including reducing exposure of infants and young children to chronic stress. Because infants' experiences are inextricably tied to their caregivers, an important target for mitigating "toxic" stress exposure in early childhood is through reducing parents' experiences of chronic stress in addition to protecting children from direct experiences of harm such as physical or sexual abuse. Conducting screening to identify when children are exposed to early life adversity is a first step; connecting families to needed support services is an essential component to addressing identified challenges. This paper presents the methodology of a three-year study of health care systems innovations designed to engage and support parents of infants to prevent and mitigate children's toxic stress exposures.

methodsKey study features included: 1) multi-component study in five U.S. communities and nine pediatric health care clinics and the families they serve, 2) a developmental evaluation approach to describe how innovations are experienced over time at three levels-community systems, pediatric providers, and families, and 3) rapid cycle feedback conducted with communities, clinics and families to co-interpret data and findings. Data sources included: 1) focus groups and interviews with community stakeholders, clinic staff, and families, 2) electronic health record and Medicaid services data extracted to assess health care quality, utilization, and financial impact, and 3) clinic-recruitment of 908 parents of infants in a longitudinal survey.

resultsThe sample is briefly characterized based on responses to the enrollment phase of the parent survey.

conclusionsWe discuss the study design elements' contribution to generating evidence needed by innovators, communities, and clinics to modify and sustain investments in these innovations to prevent or mitigate the effects of exposure to toxic stress on young children.

Indexed as

ParentsSocial Determinants of HealthCaregiversChildChild, PreschoolDelivery of Health CareHumansInfantSurveys and QuestionnairesEarly childhoodInfantsPediatric primary careSocial determinants of healthToxic stress

Identifiers

PMID33468104
PMCPMC7814628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.