Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33468091›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

Busy day effect on intrapartum adverse maternal outcomes - a population-based study of 601 247 singleton deliveries.

Riitta Vilkko, Sari Räisänen, Mika Gissler, Vedran Stefanovic, Seppo Heinonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Riitta VilkkoDoctoral Programme in Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Haartmanninkatu 8, 00290, Helsinki, Finland. riitta.vilkko@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7798-8123
Sari RäisänenSchool of Health, Tampere University of Applied Sciences, Kuntokatu 3, 33520, Tampere, Finland.
Mika GisslerInformation Services Department, THL Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, 00270, Helsinki, Finland.
Vedran StefanovicDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fetomaternal Medical Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 2, 00290, Helsinki, Finland.
Seppo HeinonenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 2, 00290, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

Helsingin ja Uudenmaan Sairaanhoitopiiri THY Y1017N0183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis was a retrospective population-based study, utilizing the data of 601 247 singleton hospital deliveries collected from the Finnish Medical Birth Register (MBR) in 2006-2016. The aim of this study was to analyse the busy day effect on intrapartum adverse maternal outcomes.

methodsTo implement the study design, daily delivery frequencies and ranges (min-max) for each delivery unit (n = 26) were stratified to the daily delivery volume distributions by the delivery unit's annual delivery volume and profile: Category (C)1 < 1000, C2 1000-1999, C3 2000-2999, C4 ≥ 3000 and C5 the profile of university hospitals. To study the busy day effect, the quiet, optimal and busy days were defined by calculating the number of days (%) with the lowest and highest daily delivery frequencies and summed to the nearest 10 % in each hospital category. Optimal days were determined by calculating approximately 80 % of deliveries occurring between the lowest 10 %, and highest 10 % in each hospital category. Crude and adjusted odd ratios (ORs) with 99 % confidence intervals (CIs) were used to analyze the busy day effect on adverse maternal outcomes, blood transfusions, manual removal of the placenta and obstetric anal sphincter injuries, separately in each hospital category.

resultsThe busy day effect was associated with the 28 % (99 % CI 8-52 %) and 25 % (99 % CI 11-40 %) increased need for blood transfusions in C2 and university hospitals (C5), respectively, whereas 22 % (99 % CI 10-31 %) less blood transfusions were needed at university hospitals during quiet days. In C3 hospitals, 83 % (99 % CI 65-92 %) less blood transfusions were needed during busy days. Obstetric and anal sphincter injury rates declined during quiet days by 22 % (99 % CI 3-38 %) only in university hospitals.

conclusionsThe findings of this study identify no specific pattern to the busy day effect for adverse maternal outcomes defined as manual removal of the placenta or obstetric and anal sphincter injuries. However, both quiet and busy days seem to be associated with increased or decreased need for blood transfusions in different sized delivery units. Findings also suggest that quiet days are associated with a decreased number of obstetric and anal sphincter injuries.

Indexed as

AdultAnal CanalBlood TransfusionDelivery, ObstetricFemaleFinlandHospitalsHumansObstetric Labor ComplicationsParturitionPregnancyRegistriesRetrospective StudiesWorkloadYoung AdultAdverse maternal outcomeBlood transfusionBusy day effectDaily delivery volumeHospital sizeMedical birth register

Identifiers

PMID33468091
PMCPMC7816350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.