Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33468045›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2021

Major challenges and barriers in clinical decision-making as perceived by emergency medical services personnel: a qualitative content analysis.

Mostafa Bijani, Saeed Abedi, Shahnaz Karimi, Banafsheh Tehranineshat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Determining the level of resilience amongst critical care transport professionals in a fixed-wing air ambulance environment.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mostafa BijaniDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, 81936-13119, Iran. bizhani_mostafa@yahoo.com.
Saeed AbediDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, 81936-13119, Iran.
Shahnaz KarimiDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, 81936-13119, Iran.
Banafsheh TehranineshatCommunity-based Psychiatric Care Research Center, Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHaving to work in unpredictable and critical conditions, emergency care services (EMS) personnel experience complicated situations at the scene of accidents which, inevitably, influence their clinical decisions. There is a lack of research into the challenges which these professionals encounter. Accordingly, the present study aims to explore the major challenges and barriers which affect clinical decision-making from the perspective of EMS personnel.

methodsThe present study is a qualitative work with a content analysis approach. Selected via purposeful sampling, the subjects were 25 members of the EMS personnel in Iran who met the inclusion criteria. The study lasted from December 2019 to July 2020. Sampling was maintained to the point of data saturation. Data were collected using semi-structured, in-depth, individual interviews. The collected data were analyzed via qualitative content analysis.

resultsThe results of data analysis were categorized into four themes and eight categories. The main themes were professional capabilities, occupational and environmental factors, inefficient organizational management, and ethical issues.

conclusionThe results of the present study show that clinical knowledge, experience, and skills contribute to emergency care personnel's professional capabilities in making clinical decisions. Good teamwork skills and time management can prevent feelings of confusion when the number of the injured to be attended to is large. Effective clinical decision-making skills can not only help the personnel make the right decision, but enhances their resilience and enables them to adapt to hard and unpredictable conditions. Professional factors, organizational management, and ethical matters constitute the other major factors which influence the clinical decision-making of emergency care personnel at the scene of accidents and determine the quality of their clinical performance. Thus, it is essential that pre-hospital emergency care managers improve the quality of EMS personnel's clinical decision-making skill.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesClinical Decision-MakingDecision MakingEmergenciesHumansQualitative ResearchClinical decision-makingEmergency medical servicesQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID33468045
PMCPMC7815282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.