Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33467761›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Recommendations for Standardizing Thorax PET-CT in Non-Human Primates by Recent Experience from Macaque Studies.

Marieke A Stammes, Jaco Bakker, Richard A W Vervenne, Dian G M Zijlmans, Leo van Geest, Michel P M Vierboom, Jan A M Langermans, Frank A W Verreck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparative Study of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marieke A StammesDepartment of Parasitology, Biomedical Primate Research Centre, 2288 GJ Rijswijk, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4261-6535
Jaco BakkerAnimal Science Department, Biomedical Primate Research Centre, 2288 GJ Rijswijk, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6670-1887
Richard A W VervenneDepartment of Parasitology, Biomedical Primate Research Centre, 2288 GJ Rijswijk, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6167-1674
Dian G M ZijlmansAnimal Science Department, Biomedical Primate Research Centre, 2288 GJ Rijswijk, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7318-9711
Leo van GeestAnimal Science Department, Biomedical Primate Research Centre, 2288 GJ Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
Michel P M VierboomDepartment of Parasitology, Biomedical Primate Research Centre, 2288 GJ Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
Jan A M LangermansAnimal Science Department, Biomedical Primate Research Centre, 2288 GJ Rijswijk, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4806-4412
Frank A W VerreckDepartment of Parasitology, Biomedical Primate Research Centre, 2288 GJ Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
Biomedical Primate Research Centre · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health OPP1130668H2020 Research Infrastructures 730964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the possibilities of routine clinical measures and assays on readily accessible bio-samples, it is not always essential in animals to investigate the dynamics of disease longitudinally. In this regard, minimally invasive imaging methods provide powerful tools in preclinical research. They can contribute to the ethical principle of gathering as much relevant information per animal as possible. Besides, with an obvious parallel to clinical diagnostic practice, such imaging platforms are potent and valuable instruments leading to a more refined use of animals from a welfare perspective. Non-human primates comprise highly relevant species for preclinical research to enhance our understanding of disease mechanisms and/or the development of improved prophylactic or therapeutic regimen for various human diseases. In this paper, we describe parameters that critically affect the quality of integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT) in non-human primates. Lessons learned are exemplified by results from imaging experimental infectious respiratory disease in macaques; specifically tuberculosis, influenza, and SARS-CoV-2 infection. We focus on the thorax and use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose as a PET tracer. Recommendations are provided to guide various stages of PET-CT-supported research in non-human primates, from animal selection, scan preparation, and operation, to processing and analysis of imaging data.

Indexed as

fluorodeoxyglucosemacaquesnon-human primatesPET–CTrespiratory infectionsthorax

Identifiers

PMID33467761
PMCPMC7830664
OpenAlexW3119153882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.