Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33467447›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Stimulation in Osteogenesis and Chondrogenesis: Signaling Pathways and Therapeutic Implications.

Katia Varani, Fabrizio Vincenzi, Silvia Pasquini, Irene Blo, Simona Salati, Matteo Cadossi, Monica De Mattei

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Open Challenges and Opportunities in Piezoelectricity for Tissue Regeneration.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Cellular and Molecular Effects of Magnetic Fields.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katia VaraniDepartment of Translational Medicine and for Romagna, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4562-1348
Fabrizio VincenziDepartment of Translational Medicine and for Romagna, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5027-1699
Silvia PasquiniDepartment of Translational Medicine and for Romagna, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Irene BloDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Simona SalatiIGEA SpA, Clinical Biophysiscs, 41012 Carpi, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8072-1128
Matteo CadossiIGEA SpA, Clinical Biophysiscs, 41012 Carpi, Italy.
Monica De MatteiDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5789-0601
University of Ferrara · ITIGEA Clinical Biophysics (Italy) · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are the main cell players in tissue repair and thanks to their self-renewal and multi-lineage differentiation capabilities, they gained significant attention as cell source for tissue engineering (TE) approaches aimed at restoring bone and cartilage defects. Despite significant progress, their therapeutic application remains debated: the TE construct often fails to completely restore the biomechanical properties of the native tissue, leading to poor clinical outcomes in the long term. Pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) are currently used as a safe and non-invasive treatment to enhance bone healing and to provide joint protection. PEMFs enhance both osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation of MSCs. Here, we provide extensive review of the signaling pathways modulated by PEMFs during MSCs osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation. Particular attention has been given to the PEMF-mediated activation of the adenosine signaling and their regulation of the inflammatory response as key player in TE approaches. Overall, the application of PEMFs in tissue repair is foreseen: (1) in vitro: to improve the functional and mechanical properties of the engineered construct; (2) in vivo: (i) to favor graft integration, (ii) to control the local inflammatory response, and (iii) to foster tissue repair from both implanted and resident MSCs cells.

Indexed as

Electromagnetic FieldsBone and BonesCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedChondrogenesisHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsOsteogenesisSignal TransductionTissue Engineeringadenosine receptorschondrogenic differentiationmesenchymal stem cellsosteogenic differentiationpulsed electromagnetic fieldstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID33467447
PMCPMC7830993
OpenAlexW3120580303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.