Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33467415›Full record

ArticleInsects2021

Comparison of New Kairomone-Based Lures for

Michele Preti, Alan L Knight, Riccardo Favaro, Esteban Basoalto, Marco Tasin, Sergio Angeli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michele PretiFaculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Piazza Università 5, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6944-5142
Alan L KnightInstar Biologicals, Yakima, WA 98908, USA.
Riccardo FavaroFaculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Piazza Università 5, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.
Esteban BasoaltoFacultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Instituto de Producción y Sanidad Vegetal, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia 5110566, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-2280-8978
Marco TasinDepartment of Chemical Sciences, University of Padua, Via Marzolo 1, 35121 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7379-4954
Sergio AngeliFaculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Piazza Università 5, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8463-7476
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano · ITAustral University of Chile · CLUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies were conducted during the period 2019/2020 to evaluate the effectiveness of four lures for codling moth (

Indexed as

acetic acidcodling mothdimethyl nonatrienemonitoringpear esterpyranoid linalool oxidesex pheromone

Identifiers

PMID33467415
PMCPMC7830130
OpenAlexW3118420574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.