Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33467275›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology2020

Effects of Hoverboard on Balance in Young Soccer Athletes.

Stefano Moffa, Angelica Perna, Gabriele Candela, Alessandro Cattolico, Carmine Sellitto, Paolo De Blasiis, Germano Guerra, Domenico Tafuri, Angela Lucariello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Evaluations of Muscular Strength, Ability to Balance and Health Status in Prisoners during COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stefano MoffaDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0055-6888
Angelica PernaDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7853-9159
Gabriele CandelaDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1142-5413
Alessandro CattolicoDepartment of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, Section of Human Anatomy, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1148-9414
Carmine SellittoDepartment of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, Section of Human Anatomy, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5595-7841
Paolo De BlasiisDepartment of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, Section of Human Anatomy, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1317-7994
Germano GuerraDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences "Vincenzo Tiberio", University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4342-962X
Domenico TafuriDepartment of Sport Sciences and Wellness, University of Naples "Parthenope", 80133 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5948-1414
Angela LucarielloDepartment of Sport Sciences and Wellness, University of Naples "Parthenope", 80133 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6435-7680

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hoverboards are always more popular among children. Hoverboards are to them like a game or a mean of transport, but they could be used as a valid and useful instrument in children's training programs to improve their performance. In this study, we compared the athletic performance of two groups of 12 children. A total of 24 children aged between 8 and 11 years followed a similar training program for five months, but the first group used a hoverboard (Hb+ group: Age: Standard Deviation (SD) = 1.15 Mean = 9.66; Weight: SD = 5.90 Mean = 32; Height: SD = 7.64 Mean = 135.08) for some of the training time, differently from the second group (Hb- group: Age: SD = 1.15 Mean = 9.66; Weight: SD = 5.82 Mean = 31.16; Height: SD = 7.66 Mean = 136.16), which never used it. All of the children were asked to complete three tests (one leg test, stork test and balance beam walking test) before starting their own training program and after five months, to evaluate how their performances changed in terms of time. Comparing the recorded time difference between T0 and T1 of the Hb+ group with the same difference measured in Hb- group, it was found that there was a statistically significant difference (

Indexed as

balancechildrenhoverboardproprioception

Identifiers

PMID33467275
PMCPMC7739259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.