Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33467254›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology2020

Body Fat Assessment in International Elite Soccer Referees.

Cristian Petri, Francesco Campa, Vitor Hugo Teixeira, Pascal Izzicupo, Giorgio Galanti, Angelo Pizzi, Georgian Badicu, Gabriele Mascherini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exercise Evaluation and Prescription.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2021
    Article
  7. The Influence of Maturity Status on Anthropometric Profile and Body Composition of Youth Goalkeepers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cristian PetriSports and Exercise Medicine Unit, Clinical and Experimental Department, University of Florence, 50121 Firenze, Italy.
Francesco CampaDepartment for Life Quality Studies, University of Bologna, 47921 Rimini, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3028-7802
Vitor Hugo TeixeiraFaculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences (FCNA), University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.
Pascal IzzicupoDepartment of Medicine and Aging Science, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Giorgio GalantiSports and Exercise Medicine Unit, Clinical and Experimental Department, University of Florence, 50121 Firenze, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2054-8650
Angelo PizziA.I.A., Italian Referees Association, 00187 Rome, Italy.
Georgian BadicuDepartment of Physical Education and Special Motricity, Transilvania University of Brasov, 500068 Brasov, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4100-8765
Gabriele MascheriniSports and Exercise Medicine Unit, Clinical and Experimental Department, University of Florence, 50121 Firenze, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8842-0354

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soccer referees are a specific group in the sports population that are receiving increasing attention from sports scientists. A lower fat mass percentage (FM%) is a useful parameter to monitor fitness status and aerobic performance, while being able to evaluate it with a simple and quick field-based method can allow a regular assessment. The aim of this study was to provide a specific profile for referees based on morphological and body composition features while comparing the accuracy of different skinfold-based equations in estimating FM% in a cohort of soccer referees. Forty-three elite international soccer referees (age 38.8 ± 3.6 years), who participated in the 2018 Russian World Cup, underwent body composition assessments with skinfold thickness and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Six equations used to derive FM% from skinfold thickness were compared with DXA measurements. The percentage of body fat estimated using DXA was 18.2 ± 4.1%, whereas skinfold-based FM% assessed from the six formulas ranged between 11.0% ± 1.7% to 15.6% ± 2.4%. Among the six equations considered, the Faulkner's formula showed the highest correlation with FM% estimated by DXA (r = 0.77; R

Indexed as

anthropometrybody compositionDXAequationfat massskinfoldssoccersomatotype

Identifiers

PMID33467254
PMCPMC7739222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.