Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33467179›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

COVID-19, Fake News, and Vaccines: Should Regulation Be Implemented?

Julio Emilio Marco-Franco, Pedro Pita-Barros, David Vivas-Orts, Silvia González-de-Julián, David Vivas-Consuelo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Country readiness in responding to COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Events (VREs) in Malawi.Malawi medical journal : the journal of Medical Association of Malawi · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Suppressing Scientific Discourse on Vaccines? Self-perceptions of researchers and practitioners.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julio Emilio Marco-FrancoResearch Centre for Economics Engineering, Polytechnic University of Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1350-2539
Pedro Pita-BarrosNova School of Business and Economics, Nova University, 2775-405 Carcavelos, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0881-4928
David Vivas-OrtsFaculty of Law, University Pompeu Fabra, 08024 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0548-4756
Silvia González-de-JuliánResearch Centre for Economics Engineering, Polytechnic University of Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0274-6060
David Vivas-ConsueloResearch Centre for Economics Engineering, Polytechnic University of Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2945-7525

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We analysed issues concerning the establishment of compulsory vaccination against COVID-19, as well as the role of misinformation as a disincentive-especially when published by health professionals-and citizen acceptance of measures in this regard. Data from different surveys revealed a high degree of hesitation rather than outright opposition to vaccines. The most frequent complaint related to the COVID-19 vaccination was the fear of side effects. Within the Spanish and European legislative framework, both compulsory vaccination and government regulation of FN (Fake News) appear to be feasible options, counting on sufficient legal support, which could be reinforced by additional amendment. However, following current trends of good governance, policymakers must have public legitimation. Rather than compulsory COVID-19 vaccination, an approach based on education and truthful information, persuading the population of the benefits of a vaccine on a voluntary basis, is recommended. Disagreements between health professionals are positive, but they should be resolved following good practice and the procedures of the code of ethics. Furthermore, citizens do not support the involvement of government authorities in the direct control of news. Collaboration with the media and other organizations should be used instead.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesCommunicationCommunications MediaGovernmentHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19fake newsgovernmental regulationsmedical code of ethicsvaccination

Identifiers

PMID33467179
PMCPMC7830913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.