Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33467085›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Freba Ahmaddy, Caroline Burgard, Leonie Beyer, Viktoria Florentine Koehler, Peter Bartenstein, Matthias P Fabritius, Thomas Geyer, Vera Wenter, Harun Ilhan, Christine Spitzweg and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Role of [Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. 2-[Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Risk Stratification UsingDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Freba AhmaddyDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Caroline BurgardDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1522-8860
Leonie BeyerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7358-4495
Viktoria Florentine KoehlerDepartment of Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Peter BartensteinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Matthias P FabritiusDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3471-4701
Thomas GeyerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Vera WenterDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Harun IlhanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Christine SpitzwegDepartment of Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Andrei TodicaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1504-6565

Funding

Kuhbier-Langewiesche foundation and the Bavarian Equal Opportunities Sponsorship (BGF) no number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) Lenvatinib represents one of the most effective therapeutic options in patients with advanced radioiodine refractory differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). We aimed to assess the role of 2-deoxy-2-[

methodsIn 22 patients, a modified Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria In Solid Tumors (mPERCIST) evaluation before treatment with Lenvatinib and at 3 and 6 month follow up was performed. Further PET-parameters and morphologic tumor response using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 were assessed and their prediction of progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) was evaluated.

resultsMost patients were rated stable in morphological evaluation and progressive using a metabolic response. All patients who responded to therapy through RECIST showed a decline in nearly all Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-parameters. For both time-points, non-responders according to mPERCIST showed significantly lower median PFS and DSS, whereas according to RECIST, only DSS was significantly lower.

conclusionTumor response assessment by

Indexed as

18F-FDG-PET/CTdifferentiated thyroid cancerLenvatinibradioiodine refractory

Identifiers

PMID33467085
PMCPMC7830971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.