Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33466935›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Comparative Study of Early- and Mid-Ripening Peach (

Dasha Mihaylova, Aneta Popova, Ivelina Desseva, Nadezhda Petkova, Magdalena Stoyanova, Radka Vrancheva, Anton Slavov, Alexandar Slavchev, Anna Lante

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Validation ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  18. Amino Acid Profiles in Peach (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dasha MihaylovaDepartment of Biotechnology, Technological Faculty, University of Food Technologies, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Aneta PopovaDepartment of Catering and Tourism, Economics Faculty, University of Food Technologies, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-1290-503X
Ivelina DessevaDepartment of Analytical Chemistry and Physical Chemistry, Technological Faculty, University of Food Technologies, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Nadezhda PetkovaDepartment of Organic Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry, Technological Faculty, University of Food Technologies, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Magdalena StoyanovaDepartment of Analytical Chemistry and Physical Chemistry, Technological Faculty, University of Food Technologies, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-1298-4022
Radka VranchevaDepartment of Analytical Chemistry and Physical Chemistry, Technological Faculty, University of Food Technologies, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-5870-9157
Anton SlavovDepartment of Organic Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry, Technological Faculty, University of Food Technologies, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-2699-5929
Alexandar SlavchevDepartment of Microbiology, Technological Faculty, University of Food Technologies, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Anna LanteDepartment of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals, and Environment-DAFNAE, Agripolis, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4709-9311

Funding

Ministry of Education and Science Scientific Research Fund КП-06-Н37/23 - 2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exploring the chemical composition and biological activity of different fruit varieties is essential for the valorization of their health claims. The current study focuses on a detailed comparative analysis of three early- and two mid-ripening peach varieties: "Filina" (peach), "July Lady" (peach), "Laskava" (peach), "Gergana" (nectarine), and "Ufo 4" (flat peach). They were characterized in terms of essential nutrients such as carbohydrates (sugars and dietary fibers), amino acid content, and lipids as well as mineral content, fat-soluble vitamins, carotenoids, and chlorophyll. Polyphenolic compounds and the related antioxidant activity were also assessed. The methanolic extract of the peel seems to be richer in the studied biologically active substances compared to the fleshy part of the fruit. Anthocyanins were most abundant in "Gergana" and "July Lady" extracts (6624.8 ± 404.9 and 7133.6 ± 388.8 µg cyanidin-3-glucoside/100 g fw, resp.). The total phenol content of the samples varied from 34.11 ± 0.54 to 157.97 ± 0.67 mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/100 g fw. "Filina" and "July Lady" varieties possessed the highest antioxidant activity. Overall, the results of this study confirm that the studied peach varieties have satisfactory nutritional value and are potential sources of biologically active substances. Each variety represents an individual palette of nutrients that should be considered separately from the other.

Indexed as

biological activitymacro- and micro-nutrient profilenectarinepeachphytochemicals

Identifiers

PMID33466935
PMCPMC7830338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.