Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33466794›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

PD-L1 Testing and Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Multicenter Study on the Diagnostic Reproducibility of Different Protocols.

Simona Crosta, Renzo Boldorini, Francesca Bono, Virginia Brambilla, Emanuele Dainese, Nicola Fusco, Andrea Gianatti, Vincenzo L'Imperio, Patrizia Morbini, Fabio Pagni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Salivary biomarkers: a promising approach for predicting immunotherapy response in head and neck cancers.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Simona CrostaSection of Pathology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Milan Bicocca, ASST Monza, 20100 Milan, Italy.
Renzo BoldoriniDivision of Pathology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, 28100 Novara, Italy.
Francesca BonoSection of Pathology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Milan Bicocca, ASST Monza, 20100 Milan, Italy.
Virginia BrambillaSection of Pathology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Milan Bicocca, ASST Monza, 20100 Milan, Italy.
Emanuele DaineseDepartment of Pathology, ASST Lecco, 23900 Lecco, Italy.
Nicola FuscoIEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20100 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9101-9131
Andrea GianattiPathology Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, 24121 Bergamo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2303-7394
Vincenzo L'ImperioSection of Pathology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Milan Bicocca, ASST Monza, 20100 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9284-2998
Patrizia MorbiniPathology Unit, Policlinico S. Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Fabio PagniSection of Pathology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Milan Bicocca, ASST Monza, 20100 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9625-1637

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for blocking the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis are now available for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) in relapsing and/or metastatic settings. In this work, we compared the resulting combined positive score (CPS) of PD-L1 using alternative methods adopted in routine clinical practice and determined the level of diagnostic agreement and inter-observer reliability in this setting. The study applied 5 different protocols on 40 tissue microarrays from HNSCC. The error rate of the individual protocols ranged from a minimum of 7% to a maximum of 21%, the sensitivity from 79% to 96%, and the specificity from 50% to 100%. In the intermediate group (1 ≤ CPS < 20), the majority of errors consisted of an underestimation of PD-L1 expression. In strong expressors, 5 out of 14 samples (36%) were correctly evaluated by all the protocols, but no protocol was able to correctly identify all the "strong expressors". The overall inter-observer agreement in PD-L1 CPS reached 87%. The inter-observer reliability was moderate, with an ICC of 0.774 (95% CI (0.651; 0.871)). In conclusion, our study showed moderate interobserver reliability among different protocols. In order to improve the performances, adequate specific training to evaluate PD-L1 by CPS in the HNSCC setting should be coordinated.

Indexed as

head and neck carcinomaHNSCCPD-L1pembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID33466794
PMCPMC7830149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.