Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33466736›Full record

ArticlePolymers2021

3D-Printed Poly(ε-Caprolactone)/Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds Modified with Alkaline Hydrolysis Enhance Osteogenesis In Vitro.

Sangbae Park, Jae Eun Kim, Jinsub Han, Seung Jeong, Jae Woon Lim, Myung Chul Lee, Hyunmok Son, Hong Bae Kim, Yun-Hoon Choung, Hoon Seonwoo and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. 3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Mechanical properties, andFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sangbae ParkDepartment of Biosystems & Biomaterials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0559-4840
Jae Eun KimDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.
Jinsub HanDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.
Seung JeongDepartment of Biosystems & Biomaterials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9034-6061
Jae Woon LimDepartment of Biosystems & Biomaterials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.
Myung Chul LeeDepartment of Biosystems & Biomaterials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0566-8494
Hyunmok SonDepartment of Biosystems & Biomaterials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.
Hong Bae KimDepartment of Biosystems & Biomaterials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.
Yun-Hoon ChoungDepartment of Otolaryngology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, Korea.
Hoon SeonwooDepartment of Industrial Machinery Engineering, College of Life Sciences and Natural Resources, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 57922, Korea.
Jong Hoon ChungDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0711-5655
Kyoung-Je JangDivision of Agro-System Engineering, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea.
Seoul National University · KRAjou University · KRGyeongsang National University · KRSunchon National University · KR

Funding

Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry 116135-3National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2020R1F1A1067439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 3D-printed bioactive ceramic incorporated Poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffolds show great promise as synthetic bone graft substitutes. However, 3D-printed scaffolds still lack adequate surface properties for cells to be attached to them. In this study, we modified the surface characteristics of 3D-printed poly(ε-caprolactone)/hydroxyapatite scaffolds using O2 plasma and sodium hydroxide. The surface property of the alkaline hydrolyzed and O2 plasma-treated PCL/HA scaffolds were evaluated using field-emission scanning microscopy (FE-SEM), Alizarin Red S (ARS) staining, and water contact angle analysis, respectively. The in vitro behavior of the scaffolds was investigated using human dental pulp-derived stem cells (hDPSCs). Cell proliferation of hDPSCs on the scaffolds was evaluated via immunocytochemistry (ICC) and water-soluble tetrazolium salt (WST-1) assay. Osteogenic differentiation of hDPSCs on the scaffolds was further investigated using ARS staining and Western blot analysis. The result of this study shows that alkaline treatment is beneficial for exposing hydroxyapatite particles embedded in the scaffolds compared to O2 plasma treatment, which promotes cell proliferation and differentiation of hDPSCs.

Indexed as

3D printing3D scaffoldalkaline hydrolysishydroxyapatiteoxygen plasmasurface modification

Identifiers

PMID33466736
PMCPMC7830212
OpenAlexW3118749363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.