Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33466691›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Cancer Vaccines, Treatment of the Future: With Emphasis on HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

Sandeep Pallerla, Ata Ur Rahman Mohammed Abdul, Jill Comeau, Seetharama Jois

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06471673 (A Study of BRIA-OTS Cellular Immunotherapy in Metastatic Recurrent Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06471673 phase1 / phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Study of BRIA-OTS Cellular Immunotherapy in Metastatic Recurrent Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorBriaCell Therapeutics CorporationRan2024 to 2025Enrolled18ConditionsBreast Cancer, Breast Tumor, Cancer of Breast, Cancer of the BreastArmsBC1 cell line, Bria-OTS regimen and CPI (tislelizumab), Bria-OTS regimen and CPI (tislelizumab) expansion cohort
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. HER2International journal of oncology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Breast cancer immunotherapy: a comprehensive review.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandeep PallerlaSchool of Pharmaceutical and Toxicological Sciences and School of Clinical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Louisiana Monroe, Monroe, LA 71201, USA.
Ata Ur Rahman Mohammed AbdulIndependent Researcher, Wharton, NJ 07885, USA.
Jill ComeauSchool of Pharmaceutical and Toxicological Sciences and School of Clinical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Louisiana Monroe, Monroe, LA 71201, USA.
Seetharama JoisSchool of Pharmaceutical and Toxicological Sciences and School of Clinical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Louisiana Monroe, Monroe, LA 71201, USA.
University of Louisiana at Monroe · US

Funding

NIH HHS P20GM10324-18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of death in women. With improvements in early-stage diagnosis and targeted therapies, there has been an improvement in the overall survival rate in breast cancer over the past decade. Despite the development of targeted therapies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, as well as monoclonal antibodies and their toxin conjugates, all metastatic tumors develop resistance, and nearly one-third of HER2+ breast cancer patients develop resistance to all these therapies. Although antibody therapy has shown promising results in breast cancer patients, passive immunotherapy approaches have limitations and need continuous administration over a long period. Vaccine therapy introduces antigens that act on cancer cells causing prolonged activation of the immune system. In particular, cancer relapse could be avoided due to the presence of a longer period of immunological memory with an effective vaccine that can protect against various tumor antigens. Cancer vaccines are broadly classified as preventive and therapeutic. Preventive vaccines are used to ward off any future infections and therapeutic vaccines are used to treat a person with active disease. In this article, we provided details about the tumor environment, different types of vaccines, their advantages and disadvantages, and the current status of various vaccine candidates with a focus on vaccines for breast cancer. Current data indicate that therapeutic vaccines themselves have limitations in terms of efficacy and are used in combination with other chemotherapeutic or targeting agents. The majority of breast cancer vaccines are undergoing clinical trials and the next decade will see the fruitfulness of breast cancer vaccine therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCancer VaccinesErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansNeoplasmsTumor MicroenvironmentCancer VaccinesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinasesbreast cancercell-based vaccineDNA-based vaccineHER2therapeutic vaccinevaccine

Identifiers

PMID33466691
PMCPMC7828795
OpenAlexW3118922441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.