Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33466571›Full record

ReviewToxins2021

Botulinum Toxin: An Update on Pharmacology and Newer Products in Development.

Supriyo Choudhury, Mark R Baker, Suparna Chatterjee, Hrishikesh Kumar

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06788158 (Clinical Effects of the Intralesional Application of Incobotulinum Toxin vs Corticosteroid in Patients With Plantar Fascitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 77 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06788158 phase1active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Effects of the Intralesional Application of Incobotulinum Toxin vs Corticosteroid in Patients With Plantar Fascitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialRan2024 to 2025Enrolled20ConditionsPlantar Fasciitis of Both Feet, Pain, FunctionArmsIncobotulinum Toxin A, Glucocorticoid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 158 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Engineering Immune Cell to Counteract Aging and Aging-Associated Diseases.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Investigating the dual nature ofLe infezioni in medicina · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Probing the properties of PTEN specific botulinum toxin type E mutants.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025
    Article
  20. Advances and future directions in endoscopic bariatric therapies.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Review

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Supriyo ChoudhuryDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Neurosciences Kolkata, Kolkata 700017, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8624-8258
Mark R BakerDepartments of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Rd, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6916-1329
Suparna ChatterjeeDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Neurosciences Kolkata, Kolkata 700017, India.
Hrishikesh KumarDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Neurosciences Kolkata, Kolkata 700017, India.
Institute of Neurosciences Kolkata · INInstitute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · INRoyal Victoria Infirmary · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its introduction as a treatment for strabismus, botulinum toxin (BoNT) has had a phenomenal journey and is now recommended as first-line treatment for focal dystonia, despite short-term clinical benefits and the risks of adverse effects. To cater for the high demand across various medical specialties, at least six US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved formulations of BoNT are currently available for diverse labelled indications. The toxo-pharmacological properties of these formulations are not uniform and thus should not be used interchangeably. Synthetic BoNTs and BoNTs from non-clostridial sources are not far from clinical use. Moreover, the study of mutations in naturally occurring toxins has led to modulation in the toxo-pharmacokinetic properties of BoNTs, including the duration and potency. We present an overview of the toxo-pharmacology of conventional and novel BoNT preparations, including those awaiting imminent translation from the laboratory to the clinic.

Indexed as

Drug CompoundingDrug DevelopmentBacterial ToxinsBotulinum ToxinsDrug PrescriptionsHumansNervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular AgentsNeuromuscular JunctionRecombinant ProteinsBacterial ToxinsBotulinum ToxinsNeuromuscular AgentsRecombinant Proteinsacetylcholinebotulinum toxindystonianeuromuscular blockaderecombinant botulinum toxin

Identifiers

PMID33466571
PMCPMC7828686
OpenAlexW3122343194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.