Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33466518›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Patterns of Red and Processed Meat Consumption across North America: A Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Comparison of Dietary Recalls from Canada, Mexico, and the United States.

Sarah M Frank, Lindsay M Jaacks, Carolina Batis, Lana Vanderlee, Lindsey Smith Taillie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Testing front-of-package warnings to discourage red meat consumption: a randomized experiment with US meat consumers.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2021
    Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah M FrankCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6740-3395
Lindsay M JaacksGlobal Academy of Agriculture and Food Security, Easter Bush Campus, The University of Edinburgh, Roslin EH25 9RG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7791-5167
Carolina BatisCONACYT-Health and Nutrition Research Center, National Institute of Public Health, Av. Universidad No. 655 Colonia Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cuernavaca 62100, Mexico.
Lana VanderleeCentre Nutrition, Santé et Société (NUTRISS), L'École de Nutrition, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC GIV 0A6, Canada.
Lindsey Smith TaillieCarolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA.

Funding

UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCH UNITP30DK056350 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Ian Michael Carroll · 1999 to 2026
$31.6M
POPULATION STUDIEST32HD007168 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELIZABETH A FRANKENBERG · 1985 to 2026
$13.8M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007168NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056350Wellcome Trust 216042/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Close economic ties encourage production and trade of meat between Canada, Mexico, and the US. Understanding the patterns of red and processed meat consumption in North America may inform policies designed to reduce meat consumption and bolster environmental and public health efforts across the continent. We used nationally-representative cross-sectional survey data to analyze consumption of unprocessed red meat; processed meat; and total red and processed meat. Generalized linear models were used to separately estimate probability of consumption and adjusted mean intake. Prevalence of total meat consumers was higher in the US (73.6, 95% CI: 72.3-74.8%) than in Canada (65.6, 63.9-67.2%) or Mexico (62.7, 58.1-67.2%). Men were more likely to consume unprocessed red, processed, and total meat, and had larger estimated intakes. In Mexico, high wealth individuals were more likely to consume all three categories of meat. In the US and Canada, those with high education were less likely to consume total and processed meat. Estimated mean intake of unprocessed red, processed, and total meat did not differ across sociodemographic strata. Overall consumption of red and processed meat remains high in North America. Policies to reduce meat consumption are appropriate for all three countries.

Indexed as

DietNutrition SurveysRed MeatAdolescentAdultAgedCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMexicoMiddle AgedUnited StatesYoung AdultCanadaconsumer behaviorcross-sectional studydiet surveysenvironment and public healthmeatMexiconutrition policysocioeconomic factorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID33466518
PMCPMC7796493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.