ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2021
The "Hub and Spoke" (HandS) ECMO for "Resuscitating" Neonates with Respiratory Life-Threatening Conditions.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Interhospital Transportation of Pediatric Patients Undergoing Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV ECMO) Support-A 3-Year Regional Experience.Pediatric reports · 2026Article
- Optimizing pediatric bronchiolitis management through an integrated hub-and-spoke network: evidence from a regional Italian experience.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Observational
- Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Transport Safety-Regional and National Experiences and Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- ECMO in hinterland-feasibility and challenges (case-based narrative review).Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Inter-hospital cardiorespiratory telemonitoring of newborns and infants: a wellworking example of a hub and spoke network.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2023Article
- Meconium Aspiration Syndrome: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExtracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) implantation for neonates with severe cardiorespiratory life-threatening conditions is highly effective. However, since ECMO is a high-risk and complex therapy, this treatment is usually performed in centers with proven expertise.
methodsA retrospective review of neonates, from January 2014 to January 2020, presenting with life-threatening conditions and treated by means of Hub and Spoke (HandS) ECMO in peripheral (spoke) hospitals. Data were retrieved from our internal ECMO registry. Protocols and checklists were revised and shared with all spoke hospitals located in North-Eastern Italy.
resultsEleven neonates receiving maximal respiratory and cardiovascular support at a spoke hospital underwent HandS ECMO management. All but three patients were affected by life-threatening meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS). The median ECMO support duration and hospitalization were four (range 2-32) and 30 days (range 8-50), respectively. All but two patients (with congenital diaphragmatic hernia), were weaned off ECMO and discharged home. At a mean follow up of 33.7 ± 29.2 months, all survivors were alive and well, without medications, and normal somatic growth. All but one had normal neuropsychological development.
conclusionHandS ECMO model for neonates with life-threatening conditions is effective and successful. A specialized multidisciplinary team and close cooperation between Hub and Spoke centers are essential for success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.