Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33466334›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Effect of Feeding Wet Feed or Wet Feed Fermented by

Ahmed A Saleh, Mustafa Shukry, Foad Farrag, Mohamed M Soliman, Abdel-Moneim Eid Abdel-Moneim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Yeast (Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. CompoundAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Beneficial Effects ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Potential ofFrontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmed A SalehDepartment of Poultry Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh 33516, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-2052-5248
Mustafa ShukryDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh 33516, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-2722-2466
Foad FarragDepartment of Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh 33516, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-4048-6717
Mohamed M SolimanClinical Laboratory Sciences Department, Turabah University College, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7208-7123
Abdel-Moneim Eid Abdel-MoneimBiological Application Department, Nuclear Research Center, Atomic Energy Authority, Abu-Zaabal 13759, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-0199-6298
Kafrelsheikh University · EGEgyptian Atomic Energy Authority · EGTaif University · SA

Funding

This study was supported by Taif University Researchers Supporting Project (TURSP-2020/09), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia TURSP-2020/09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study evaluated the effect of three feeding methods (dry feed, wet feed or wet feed fermented with

Indexed as

broilersdry feedfermented wet feedgene expressionintestinal morphologyperformance

Identifiers

PMID33466334
PMCPMC7824773
OpenAlexW3118525477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.