Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33466259›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Combining the Digital, Social and Physical Layer to Create Age-Friendly Cities and Communities.

Sonja Pedell, Ann Borda, Alen Keirnan, Nicole Aimers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
21.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Urban Green Space and Subjective Well-Being of Older People: A Systematic Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. A Toolkit for Co-Designing towards Community-Based Active Ageing: Lessons Learned during Development.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Recognition and Analysis of an Age-Friendly Intelligent Sofa Design Based on Skeletal Key-Points.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Voices of Experience: What Do Low-Income Older Adults Tell Us About Mobility, Technology, and Social Participation?Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sonja PedellSchool of Design, Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.
Ann BordaCentre for Digital Transformation of Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3884-2978
Alen KeirnanLife Without Barriers, Richmond, VIC 3121, Australia.
Nicole AimersSummer Foundation, Box Hill, VIC 3128, Australia.
Swinburne University of Technology · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This qualitative investigation makes suggestions about creating age-friendly cities for older adults focusing on three domains of the World Health Organization (WHO) age-friendly city framework namely "Communication and Information", "Outdoor Spaces and Buildings" and "Social Participation". The authors present two case studies, the first one focusing on older adults using activity wearables for health self-management in the neighborhood, and the second one focusing on older adults engaged in social prescribing activities in the community. The authors then reflect on the relationships of the domains and future opportunities for age-friendly cities. These case studies apply a co-design and citizen-based approach focusing within these larger frameworks on emotions, values and motivational goals of older adults. Results suggest how the convergence of the often siloed age-friendly city components based on older adults' goals and input can lead to better social participation and longer-term health outcomes. The authors propose that the digital, physical and social aspects need to be considered in all domains of age-friendly cities to achieve benefits for older adults. Further work involving older adults in the future shaping of age-friendly neighborhoods and cities, and identifying barriers and opportunities is required.

Indexed as

AgingEnvironment DesignHealth PromotionAgedCitiesCity PlanningFemaleHumansMaleQuality of LifeResidence CharacteristicsSocial EnvironmentSocial Participationactive ageingage-friendly citiesage-friendly communitiescitizen sciencedigital data layerolder adultssocial prescribingwearable technology

Identifiers

PMID33466259
PMCPMC7794683
OpenAlexW3118869269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.