ReviewBrain sciences2021
Development of the Mechanisms Underlying Audiovisual Speech Perception Benefit.
Review in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of multisensory simultaneity judgment training on the comprehension and cortical processing of speech in noise: a randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Integration of audiovisual speech perception: From infancy to older adults.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025Article
- Children's use of spatial and visual cues for release from perceptual masking.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- Primacy of mouth over eyes to perceive audiovisual Mandarin lexical tones.Journal of eye movement research · 2023Article
- Effect of wearing personal protective equipment on acoustic characteristics and speech perception during COVID-19.Applied acoustics. Acoustique applique. Angewandte Akustik · 2022Article
- Effects of training and using an audio-tactile sensory substitution device on speech-in-noise understanding.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Incongruent visual cues affect the perception of Mandarin vowel but not tone.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Face Masks Impact Auditory and Audiovisual Consonant Recognition in Children With and Without Hearing Loss.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Audiovisual Speech Processing in Relationship to Phonological and Vocabulary Skills in First Graders.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021Article
- Designing Virtual, Moderated Studies of Early Childhood Development.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The natural environments in which infants and children learn speech and language are noisy and multimodal. Adults rely on the multimodal nature of speech to compensate for noisy environments during speech communication. Multiple mechanisms underlie mature audiovisual benefit to speech perception, including reduced uncertainty as to when auditory speech will occur, use of correlations between the amplitude envelope of auditory and visual signals in fluent speech, and use of visual phonetic knowledge for lexical access. This paper reviews evidence regarding infants' and children's use of temporal and phonetic mechanisms in audiovisual speech perception benefit. The ability to use temporal cues for audiovisual speech perception benefit emerges in infancy. Although infants are sensitive to the correspondence between auditory and visual phonetic cues, the ability to use this correspondence for audiovisual benefit may not emerge until age four. A more cohesive account of the development of audiovisual speech perception may follow from a more thorough understanding of the development of sensitivity to and use of various temporal and phonetic cues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.