Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33466242›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Optical Screening Methods for Pesticide Residue Detection in Food Matrices: Advances and Emerging Analytical Trends.

Aristeidis S Tsagkaris, Jana Pulkrabova, Jana Hajslova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Pesticide residue detection technology for herbal medicine: current status, challenges, and prospects.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Novel Analytical Methods in Food Analysis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables in Indonesia: findings of five-year proficiency testing.Accreditation and quality assurance : journal for quality, comparability and reliability in chemical measurement · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aristeidis S TsagkarisDepartment of Food Analysis and Nutrition, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, Prague 6-Dejvice, 166 28 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-4450-2611
Jana PulkrabovaDepartment of Food Analysis and Nutrition, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, Prague 6-Dejvice, 166 28 Prague, Czech Republic.
Jana HajslovaDepartment of Food Analysis and Nutrition, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, Prague 6-Dejvice, 166 28 Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 720325
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pesticides have been extensively used in agriculture to protect crops and enhance their yields, indicating the need to monitor for their toxic residues in foodstuff. To achieve that, chromatographic methods coupled to mass spectrometry is the common analytical approach, combining low limits of detection, wide linear ranges, and high accuracy. However, these methods are also quite expensive, time-consuming, and require highly skilled personnel, indicating the need to seek for alternatives providing simple, low-cost, rapid, and on-site results. In this study, we critically review the available screening methods for pesticide residues on the basis of optical detection during the period 2016-2020. Optical biosensors are commonly miniaturized analytical platforms introducing the point-of-care (POC) era in the field. Various optical detection principles have been utilized, namely, colorimetry, fluorescence (FL), surface plasmon resonance (SPR), and surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS). Nanomaterials can significantly enhance optical detection performance and handheld platforms, for example, handheld SERS devices can revolutionize testing. The hyphenation of optical assays to smartphones is also underlined as it enables unprecedented features such as one-click results using smartphone apps or online result communication. All in all, despite being in an early stage facing several challenges, i.e., long sample preparation protocols or interphone variation results, such POC diagnostics pave a new road into the food safety field in which analysis cost will be reduced and a more intensive testing will be achieved.

Indexed as

bioassaysbiosensorsfoodoptical detectionpesticide residuespoint-of-care diagnosticsscreening methodssmartphones

Identifiers

PMID33466242
PMCPMC7824741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.